Internal Revenue Laws Repealed: 1939

                                                                       

During my time as an income tax activist (tax protester), there were many arguments that seemed to show that the income tax in the United States is a complete fraud.  Some say it is "voluntary", some used the 861 position (easy to prove with the "code"), some thought that the 16th Amendment was never ratified (plausible but hard to prove), and some say that there is no bona fide taxing statute.  I leaned more to the 861 position because it says what it says, but it is a bit difficult to explain to the uninitiated.

     Sometime in June 2003, during a meeting of income tax researchers of the "patriot" groups from all over the country, Jack Cohen held up a little, dark red income tax code book.  And in that book, it says that the internal revenue laws were repealed at 53 Stat 1.  My jaw dropped.  If that were true, it would simplify any presentations of evidence in any court or IRS hearing.  But what was more startling was that Jack was essentially ignored by almost all of the group of 20 researchers with the exception of me.

     Of course, the "patriot" groups made a lot of money helping people fight the IRS so then a real solution would be ignored.  It's like the medical profession: There's no money in a cure.  I have had this posted on the internet for over seven years, and yet there has very little response.  The so-called "conservative" media wouldn't touch the issue.

     I found myself in front of a federal judge in Sacramento who put me in jail for contempt of court because I wouldn't comply with a court order to file my tax returns.  I asked him if he expected me to file the returns according to the law.  He indicated that it would be the case, and I then told him the internal revenue laws were repealed at 53 Stat 1, so where should I go from here?  I am not willing to do any function that requires me to break any of God's commandments. In this case, I was expected to lie.   I was eventually released after 88 days but my business was destroyed, my marriage of 32 years was already in ruins, and my reputation severely compromised.  The New York Times seemed to  coordinate stories and my name was splattered all over the wire services.

     My marriage was generally a happy one, but we did have our challenges.  The breaking point came when the DOJ started coming after me and my wife couldn't take the pressure.  She would cry hysterically because her whole life was being turned upside down.  One night she cried: "Please make this go away."  She knew I was right on the tax issue, but it was extremely difficult or impossible to get any remedy.  I was devastated at the loss of my marriage, because coming from a divorced family myself, my big goal in life was to stay with the same woman for the rest of my life.

     I had grown up with complete respect for the law and the government and I came to realize that they make the mafia look like a bunch of panty-waists.  I knew that the government had corrupted people in it, but I still held out hope that somewhere there would be some honor in the system.  I was wrong.  Religious leaders just sat on their hands while people like me tried to correct what we thought was a major problem.  The late Richard Simkanin, Nick Jesson, Sherri Jackson, ex-IRS agent, my co-defendant Joe Banister also an ex-IRS agent, and many other people have desperately tried to resolve the income tax issue.  Joe Banister and I appeared on 60 Minutes II in April of 2001.  By bringing national attention to the issue, we  painted a big target on our backs.  And we still feel the effects of it today.

    While I have good business skills, especially in sales, I can't go out and get a regular job any longer, as I can't get past the HR departments.  My whole life has changed, so I live a much different life than I had before.  I lost most of my possessions and I have learned not to have much of anything.  All of this happened to me because I refused to lie.  I cannot function properly without the truth of any matter.  But what was hard to take was the destruction of my marriage.  We had been together almost every day since our early twenties. (I'm 65 as of this writing.)

     Now, I just stay to myself.  I'm not a complete recluse, but I don't go to very many places.  I like to be outside and hike.  I'm still a friendly man and I enjoy the company of other people, but the world that I thought I lived in is something much different.  I'm not bitter because I have learned that it won't do me any good.  My situation is what it is and it could have been a lot worse.

     I met men in prison who were in for 20+ years for nonviolent crimes.  I knew men who died from the shabby medical care while in prison.  And many men had their wives divorce them because they couldn't wait until their husbands got out.  I even found out that Title 18 was never properly passed by Congress—no surprise there—and that no one is lawfully detained in federal prison.

     I don't know what is going to happen in this country, but the impending payback that will be by the wrath of God is building.  I see no other way to fix any of this unless people start keeping God's commandments.  And I know in my life, God has paid me back for every rotten thing I have done, so how much more will it be for the people who operate government?  Who can endure such a calamity?

     Whether it is "Show Me the Law" regarding income taxes, or "Where's the Birth Certificate", or

any other legitimate questioning of the government--the real condition of our existence is that we have no cognizable law, other than God's commandments and the natural law that can be dependably used.  The United States Constitution and the Bill Rights are not operative in any courtroom in the United States.  The true condition is that the government is completely nonresponsive for the benefit of the people at large. It treats the people as if they are animals or livestock; to be fleeced--production drones to feed the pockets of the greedy communists called "Government". It is structurally evil and it is structurally stupid; completely lawless and self-serving.

     The value of keeping God's commandments and the natural law cannot be underestimated.  That is where the true power of life resides.

_______________________

03/21/16"  Here is an article I wrote on December 11th, 2003 on how Congress passes laws.  No one can argue that the internal revenue laws were repealed and never enacted again.  The basis of the income tax today is based upon the 1954 Code which in turn was based on a law that was repealed.  

When Congress passes laws, there is a very specific procedure that they follow. Laws are enacted by either a Bill or a Resolution that may originate in the House or the Senate. “A bill that has been agreed to in an identical form by both bodies becomes the law of the land only after: 1. Presidential approval; or 2. failure by the President to return it with objections to the House in which it originated within 10 days, (Sundays excepted) while Congress is in session; or 3. the overriding of a presidential veto by the two-thirds vote in each House.”

For a full explanation see

http://thomas.loc.gov/home/lawsmade.bysec/formsofaction.html

Once a bill or resolution is enacted it must be published. “One of the important steps in the enactment of a valid law is the requirement that it shall be made known to the people who are bound by it.”  This makes sense since the people must have a place to refer to, in order to find out what their obligations are, if any, to the Government.

When the bills and resolutions are enacted, they are first published as a “slip law”, which means they are published in an “unbound pamphlet.”

These slip laws become “competent evidence” in all federal and state courts, tribunals, and public offices.

They then become published in the United States Statutes at Large, and these are “legal evidence” of the laws, and are accepted as proof of the laws in any court in the United States.

For a full explanation see: http://Thomas.loc.gov/home/lawsmade.bysec/publication.html

The statutes are then codified by the Law Revision Counsel of the House of Representatives.  The codes become “prima facie” evidence of the law, and they stand as law unless rebutted or challenged.  However, the codes are not law, but simply prima facie (on its face) evidence of the law.  This kind of evidence should be rebutted or challenged, especially when dealing with any alleged internal revenue code.

However, when communicating with the Internal Revenue Service, literally thousands upon thousands of people have been asking the simple question, “Show me the law”, and have been stonewalled by that agency without any apparent recourse.  People have been thrown in prison for violating a “law” that hasn’t been disclosed when

demanded. 

Why does this happen?  It would seem to be obvious, that the Government would  put forth the law when requested.  Why don’t they do it?  I submit that the reason is these laws simply do not exist because they were repealed in 1939.  Yes, that is correct, the internal revenue laws were repealed in that year. 

It Happened February 10^th, 1939.

Look at Exhibit A, it is a copy of the INTERNAL REVENUE CODE February 10^th, 1939 [H. R. 2762] [Public, No 1] Chapter 2  At Sec 4. it says the following: “…all such laws and parts of laws codified herein, to the extent they relate exclusively to internal revenue, are repealed, effective, except as provided in Sec. 5.” 

Section 5. “Continuance of  Existing Law.- Any provision of law in force on the 2^ndday of January 1939 corresponding to a provision contained in the Internal Revenue Title shall remain in force until the corresponding provision under such Title takes effect.”

What just happened?  It appears that indeed, the internal revenue laws were repealed and saved in the Internal Revenue Title for use to preserve the rights and liabilities that occurred when these internal revenue laws were in effect.  But since they were repealed, they no longer applied, after the date of enactment, to anyone unless the liability occurred before the enactment of this statute.  In other words, they were moved to the Internal Revenue Title for savings or archive purposes, and that they only applied to those who incurred a liability before the date of enactment. The Internal Revenue Title thus contained repealed law.

Now look at Exhibit B, which is Public Law 591-Chapter 736, approved August 16^th, 1954, H.R. 8300 which is called Internal Revenue Code of 1954.  On the eleventh line down it states, “To revise the internal revenue laws of the United States.”  What laws? The laws in the Internal Revenue Title were repealed laws.  So what did they revise? They revised nothing.  They did indeed give the perception that these laws were being enacted, however, it would be a legislative impossibility given the normal procedures Congress uses to enact laws.  Remember, Congress enacts laws, they do not enact Codes.  Codes are written by codifiers, and they are an index to make it easier and more orderly to find the law.

As I understand this, Congress can only revise codes, but they amend statutes and statutes are the publication of the laws.  So it appears to be what some call a “legislative orphan.”  It didn’t follow the normal process Congress uses to enact laws.  We can only surmise, that Congress pulled a fast one and made it appear that the internal revenue laws were “revised” when the truth of the matter is that they attempted to “enact” a statute based upon repealed law.  The lawmaking process does not work that way. Congress cannot amend repealed laws, they would have to enact new ones.

If the internal revenue laws were repealed, and that appears to be the fact, what does this mean?  Did Congress do this on purpose?  Or did it happen over a period of time between 1939 and 1954?  What did they know, and when did they know it?  We may never be able to answer that question, but we do know that they did it, and the law still stands today.

Many in the “tax honesty” movement, have been saying over and over again, “Show me the law…” and the government remains silent.  A complete question is: Show me the law that makes me liable for the tax.  And again, the government remains silent.  It is because there is no law, and the government knows it.  If they actually pointed to a purported liability, it would be a gross error, or worse, a complete lie. 

I’ve had two occasions myself and I asked the question to IRS officials, “Please tell me what statute, code, or regulation that makes me liable for the tax, and I got nothing but silence.  One IRS appeals officer told me, “I don’t have to answer that, that’s compelled testimony.”

Therefore, since the internal revenue laws were repealed, what is the purpose in studying the codes?  Nothing. Why study codes that are not supported by law?  It doesn’t make any sense.  It appears that the process of studying codes occurs because people think that they are law, but the reality is that they may or may not be an accurate representation of the law.  One should always demand the underlying statute before answering any complaint or charge.  Remember, the “slip laws” are competent evidence, the statutes are legal evidence, and the codes are prima facie evidence of the law.  If someone is dealing with an IRS issue, I would most certainly demand to see the slip laws along with the statutes.

In fact, the Department of Justice states the following: “The text of all statutes alleged to have been violated, including the penalty provision, and the pertinent statute of limitations should be typed out in full either in the body of the prosecutor's affidavit or as exhibits to the prosecutor's affidavit. If attached as an exhibit, each statute should be typed on a separate page. If the text of the pertinent statute is unusually long or convoluted, contact the Office of International Affairs regarding the possibility of reduction. It is usually not necessary to also include the applicable provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines.” 

http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00607.htm

In almost every instance I have seen in income or employment tax cases, there is no lawful affidavit sworn by a competent witness and there is no statute included in any charge/claim.  Many people have been put in jail, based upon unsworn charges with no statutes.

Therefore, it is essential that the statutes be included in any kind of charge, and this is something that  overlooked in the cases I’ve seen.  Why?  In the case of the internal revenue laws, it appears they were repealed in 1939 and no new internal revenue laws were enacted.  The government attorneys simply move their process forward because we don’t challenge their presentments,

Any charges from the federal government that does not include lawfully enacted statutes are nothing more than meritless, frivolous, charges that are meant to embarrass, oppress, harass, and intimidate the people.

How was this fact passed over by so many researchers?  The power of breaking a belief that one has held most of their life is quite difficult to break. 

About two years ago, at a research meeting in Oklahoma, Jack Cohen, from Washington state, pointed out this fact of the 1939 internal revenue laws were repealed. Yes, we’ve been sitting on this for two years, but we just didn’t realize the implications.  Jack held up the book to all the researchers.  They all looked at it, but then they completely forgot about it and carried on with little discussion.  I was there, and since the other researchers didn’t have much of an interest, I thought maybe there was not much merit to Jack’s statement.  But I kept thinking that if what Jack said was true, then we don’t have to go through all this other material if the internal revenue laws were repealed.  Why are we studying codes if there is no law?  Even now, with the evidence in my hands, it is still hard to believe, but the statutes speak for themselves.  It is our knowledge and understanding that seems to be subject to our old ways of thinking.

Therefore, unless we’re missing something, it appears that indeed the internal revenue laws were repealed and that may be one of the reasons that the government refuses to “show me the law”.  There isn’t one.

 Now, I find it much easier to simply ask the facts question:  What facts do you have that show that the XXXXXlaws apply to me?  They can't or don't want to answer the facts question but they will steamroll a defendant into prison based upon laws that are based upon a fraud.

Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land

    

The Grace of Repentance: Keeping God's Commandments

      I am Walter Allen Thompson, the author of Grace of Repentance: Keeping God's Commandments.
     This book has been in the making for over five years of extensive thought and study.
It covers what none of us were taught in "church". I have spent over 20 years trying to understand as to why there is so much  scriptural error in the professing "Christian" church.  Find out how the oath is one of the most damaging acts a man can do to himself.  The information in the Grace of Repentance: Keeping God's Commandments include:

• Books that were used in the early Christian church and reasons why they were removed from use.
• Evidence that Paul's writings were either intentionally distorted, or heretical
• How some early Christian writings are more helpful in helping the believer keep God's commandments
• The commandments and natural law are mankind's moral structure.
• Covers authority of truth over the authority of any writing
• Discusses the importance of keeping God's commandments
• Shows how some early Christian writings confirm the divinity and deity of the Messiah

This is a very good book as it goes to areas of the Christian belief that few writers have ventured. It should be interesting to anyone who is open to things that are truthful, but goes against the grain of the common understanding.
Don't be deceived by organized religion; the book The Grace of Repentance: Keeping God's Commandments, should confirm your faith in God, but diminish your interest in organized religion. It is interesting and thought provoking.  Most importantly, it should help to build your faith in God by understanding that his commandments are the true source of freedom.

Please note that this book is available in ebook format only. You do not have to be a PayPal member to process your purchase. Just click the Add to Cart, PayPal button, and enter your card information and download the book.                                             

This book is available in PDF format and may be transferred to any eReader, computer, or smartphone.  It will need an Adobe Reader which is available at http://www.adobe.com

Best when you set the reader to "Reflow Text."  This way, you'll have the page numbers and the format that I wanted.  If you want another format such as MOBI or ePub, then send me an email at tripleog2010atgmail.com and I'll send you an extra copy at no charge.

 

Every Good Man is Free: A Review

     The title of this writing, Every Good Man is Free, from Philo caught my eye a few years ago and I found it extremely interesting because it seems to conform to my belief that a man who is good is one who is free.  I had never heard it stated in that manner.  I want to go through this writing and point out the things that I think are useful and true.  Since Philo lived around 40CE, I only have the text on which to rely.  I consider any writing secondary information.  What I like to do is to look at a writing and then figure out if what it has to say is true or false.  I never accept the authority of any writing unless I have some kind of way to verify the veracity of it.

"....every wicked man was a slave, and that proposition I fully established by many natural and unquestionable argument;"   "......we will proceed to show that every virtuous man is free."

     Anyone who offends God in any way is indeed a slave.  He is in bondage to Satan or evil and there is no way a man can please God in breaking any of His commandments.  An evil man constantly lives with the guilty conscience that is provoked by his wicked acts.  He lives in a satanic stupor in which good and evil are blurred to the point that he has a very difficult life.  I remember how I have been repaid for every evil thing I ever did and the only way for me to avoid any more payback in the future is to stop doing evil things and learn to be a good man.
     Almost every church or religious groups say that it is impossible to be a good person.  This is the kind of nonsense that distorts reality because we are supposed to be good people.  So why would a religious group say the opposite?  It is simple: They are liars.  The whole point of the commandments is for mankind to live within those boundaries which will produce an enormous benefit for those people who do good things, but evil to those that don't.

"...God is my ruler, and no mortal man....."
"For, in real truth, that man alone is free who has God for his leader;..."

 

     Ultimately, this is the only viable condition for any man, woman, or child.  Because man-made laws are too inconsistent, too capricious, and too convoluted to be of any practical use.  However, God's natural laws are very easy to understand because they are self-evident.  By taking other men out of the equation, the true relationship between God and man is direct and profound.  There is no middleman because it isn't needed.  The goal should be the acquisition of virtue and good character.  These things can be acquired by keeping within the natural law of God's creation.  And that is all for which most people are responsible.  We don't need any religious nonsense to satisfy God.  What we need is to build good character within ourselves in order to defeat the evil.  Evil is weak and ineffective, and there is no good thing that can come from it.  And people who are engaged in evil are then slaves to it.  There's a reason why it is called bondage.

"But the virtuous man has absolutely no obstacle at all since he rises up against, and resists, and overthrows, and tramples on love, and fear, and cowardice, and pain, and all things of that kind, as if they were rivals defeated by him in the public games.  For he has learnt to disregard all the commands which those most unlawful masters of the soul seek to imposed upon him,"

Notice the use of the words "unlawful masters."  Can we not apply them to our religious and political leaders?  All politicians and religious leaders I am aware of are chronic liars and only use God's laws if it suits their agenda.  But when their laws are in opposition to God's order, then they will use their own laws and attempt to usurp the authority of God.  These people are losers because their actions will incur the wrath of God.  They not only disrespect God's wishes but also, they want to replace God with a form of a "god-state."  If evil people cannot reside within God's natural order, then he is a slave to the depravity of Satan.  There is no point in cursing evil people because they have already done it to themselves.  This is why it is very important to build the character with virtues.

"..though still the laws of nature, which are more stable than those of men,..."

You don't really need a philosopher to point out this fact, but many of us just haven't thought about it very much.  God's existence is self-evident in nature itself.  Nature or the created thing isn't God, but simply the creation of God.  No one but a complete lunatic would deny the existence of God.  Now, to be fair to atheists, it is my opinion that what atheists really object to is organized religion more than they disbelieve in the existence of God.  I think all of the religious groups in the world do more harm to the betterment of mankind than any explosion of a nuclear weapon.  Most are rabid liars, and they don't have a clue about the natural order of life.  All men are in awe and admiration of the things of nature and nature can give us better entertainment or enjoyment than anything in the various medias.  And by observing nature, we see how it has worked for thousands and thousands of years; flawlessly, with unspeakable beauty.  My goal in life is to finish it out observing those natural laws and try to keep my mind free of the intellectual garbage that has done so much damage to us all in the past.  Nature's laws work for the betterment of everything; man's laws do not.  The stability of nature's laws is self-evident, and there can be no argument within rational thought.

"But the virtuous man does do everything wisely; therefore he alone is free.  And indeed the man whom it is not possible either to compel to do anything or to prevent from doing anything, cannot possibly be a slave; and one cannot compel or prevent the virtuous man."

This is a very important point.  A wise man cannot be compelled to do anything that he doesn't want to do.  A virtuous man cannot be corrupted.  And I think that if more men and women made it a point to avoid their evil inclinations it would make their lives--and those around them-- a lot more pleasant.
No matter what the situation, the virtuous man will always have the upper hand in everything because he is setting his foundation upon the natural law that is in turn established by the God who created us.

"...But the wise man only desires such things as proceed from virtue,..."

A virtuous man understands that there is nothing to be gained from the fruit of evil.  There is no benefit to evil.  The wise man only desires that which he has lawfully gained and not from

that which was obtained through an evil source.  There is a lot of self-preservation in knowing how to be a good man.  Most of all the bad things that happen to us be a result of the evil we have done.  Of course, we do know that sometimes bad things happen to good people; but I'm not talking about that.  I know just about every reader can identify something bad that happened to them, and many times may have thought that somehow God paid him back for the evil that he had done.  Every man who builds up his own character is the one who becomes pleasing to God and he doesn't have to worry about God's wrath paying him back for any evil deeds.

"..and thus the people are taught piety, and holiness, and justice, and economy, and the science of regulating the state, and the knowledge of such things as are naturally good, or bad, for indifferent, and to choose what is right to avoid what is wrong, using a threefold variety of definitions, and rules, and criteria, namely, the love of God, and the love of virtue, and the love of mankind.  Accordingly, the sacred volumes present an infinite number of instances of the disposition devoted to the love of God, and of a continued and uninterrupted purity throughout the whole of life, of a careful avoidance of oaths and falsehood, and of a strict adherence to the

principle of looking on the Deity as the cause of everything which is good and nothing which is evil."

In most decisions of our lives, the primary issue should always be this: Is it good or is it evil?  This is what we all should be asking ourselves before we do anything.   Then remember that if we choose good, then we are free; and, if we choose evil, then we become slaves.  We should be matching up our thinking with God's commandments and His natural law.  God created everything to be good and He didn't create any evil as mankind does that himself through the exercise of his free will.  Notice that he also warns the reader to avoid oaths and falsehood.  I've written a lot about the dangers of the oath on this blog, and I just want to point out that I'm not the only one what has noticed the evil of oath-taking.

"..Slavery, then, is of two kinds; slavery of the soul and slavery of the body.  Now, of our bodies, men are masters; but over our souls, wickedness and the passions have the dominion.  And we may speak of freedom in the same manner.  For one kind of freedom gives fearlessness of body in respect of any dangers which can come upon it from men of still more powerful body; while the other produces peace to the mind, by putting a check upon the authority of the passions."

Evil and passions have a way of putting us into a type of stupor to where we do evil things and we can't seem to control it.  By exercising a little self-control, any man can separate himself from evil and build up his character by obeying God's commandments and stay within the natural order.    The mind and the soul should be the easiest things to get under control.  I'm just expressing an opinion here because I think these passions of the soul are contained within every man's body.  Once the mind and soul are free, then the work can begin to get the body out of slavery too.  This may be more difficult because that would take the consideration of the oppressors and that's not likely to happen.

The reason that I found this article so interesting is that it shows the relationship of a man who is good and stays within the natural law which is easy to understand.  Religions seem to blur the common sense that God established under natural law.  When I conduct my behavior to be in line with God's commandments, I seem to have  more inner peace and I don't have a lot of bad things happening around me.  This is in contrast as I look back in my life and I can attribute some bad things happening to me because of my disobedience to God's law.  Having said that, I am not a religious man, and I don't practice any religious rituals because they always have the potential to lead me into idolatry.  I just leave all religious rituals alone as they are too dangerous to use.  I don't go to any churches or religious functions  because there is simply too much idolatry.  If I read any religious writings, I always try to confirm them with God's commandments or the natural law.  If the writings don't fit those parameters, or there are a lot of contradictions, I just leave them alone as they will be too unreliable to base a true faith in God.

Goodness and virtue are things that every man, woman, or child should be pursuing rather than digging themselves deeper and deeper into the hole of evil.  Everyone should be using rational thought and ask themselves if their beliefs in anything stand the test of common sense.  In addition, there is no sense in studying evil people and evil events.  They are what they are and it is destructive to the mind to keep studying things that are stupid; nothing smart comes from it.  Sure, you need to know the basics, but after that, there's no sense in view it over and over again.  Keeping the mind continually focused on the goal of becoming a good man or woman should be of the highest priority.


Walter Allen Thompson

    

The God-State

     Idolatry today is a massive problem that needs to be dealt with or it is going to destroy everything.  There is nothing good or fun about idolatry and it ruins the life.  Idolatry comes from Satan or Lucifer and it comes with the desire of man or evil to become God.  That is a pathetic aspiration, however, this is what people do to themselves every day, and they even listen to people tell them that they can be gods.
I'm going to examine just one small part of idolatry and show how destructive it is and give some suggestions on how to avoid it.
     The first commandment says that we are not to have any false gods before our Creator.  This should be an easy commandment to keep, but most of us have been subjected to horrible religions which teach almost everything else but what we need to know that will help us enjoy our lives.  And the sad part is that every time we commit one of these sins, we bring upon ourselves the wrath of God.  He knows exactly how to pay us back for our misdeeds.  The payback is really bad and it will manifest itself in many ways.  And when we commit sins, we defile those around us in ways that we cannot imagine.  According to the Epistle of James, all sin is idolatry.
     The most glaring example of a false god is the state.  Any state that declares that it is "the supreme law of the land" has a problem.  Only the Creator has the authority and the ability to declare the supreme law of the land.  Only God can set forth the workings of nature and the universe.  However,
man thinks that he can be a god by setting forth his own rules.  For example: people think that women have a right to abortions.  However, abortions are state sanctioned murder paid for with tax dollars in many cases.  But what about the rights of the man or woman being aborted?  Oh....didn't think of that?  The commandment against killing is always broken when it comes to abortion.  But the state has no respect for God's laws.  The state attempts to usurp God's natural order and makes our lives a living hell.
     There are other ways the state attempts to overthrow God.  God set forth the universe by his own oath, yet God teaches for men not to take oaths.  All the governments I know of operate on the oath.  The oath taken by a man is idolatry and it should never be done.  Most religions operate on oaths, which means that they represent a false god.  Any man who swears an oath is acting like a pagan.  Almost every government official has taken an oath.  All operatives in the courts in the United States have sworn oaths; which means that they are all liars.  Having been on the receiving end of the federal judicial system, I can verify that the whole process is nothing but lies.  It can't be avoided because it relies on the satanic system based on the oath.
     Somehow, these states think that it is proper for them to kill people and to start wars.  They cause trouble in almost every sector of the world and then kill their sons and daughters in lands that have nothing to do with them.  The people of the world have a very small moral structure to work from because the state sets a bad example.  In God's world, the state is nothing.  If the state doesn't honor God's commandments, then society is a complete failure and eventually God will destroy it.
     The state institutes a banking system based on interest and usury.  Based on any reasonable interpretation of scripture, it is well-known that interest or usury is considered stealing.  Yet, the whole financial systems of the world are built upon it.  And having a few hundred years to look back on, I can see the futility of a financial system based upon interest.  This is why the United States and any other state that uses this system will be considered a failed state, and it will descend into chaos.
     The state builds statues and idols as monuments to their failure.  The building of statues is simply idolatry and they are completely unnecessary.  And although most people aren't that dumb to worship them, some actually do it.
     What evil does is to first provide a need.  People like stability in their lives and the government gives it to them. The government provides various functions so that there is some kind of order and that people will be able to take their issues to an impartial court if necessary.  However, once the people's trust is acquired by the government, it then turns on its own people and it steals their substance and destroys their lives.  Why?  Because the state--being satanic in nature--wants to destroy the lives of the people.  It isn't there to do any good thing or righteous deed; it is there to destroy every man, woman, and child on the face of the earth.
     When I encounter evil, I don't have to look much farther than the oath.  Once I see that I'm off to do something else.  Because when these evil people say God, who they really mean is Satan.  Unless a state can conform to God's commandments, life will be completely miserable.
     The various religions actually conform to the state in that they disregard God's commandments.  This gives the state the needed mind-control needed to lull the people into a satanic stupor.  So it is not just a political problem, it is also a religious and spiritual problem.  All men are subject to the same God, just as they are to the natural forces of life here on Earth.  But when their minds are distorted into thinking that the lie is the truth, the evil seems to take control with no end to it.
     Keeping God's commandments which comply with the natural law are necessary in order to have a properly seated government.  Some might argue that it would violate the idea of separation of church and state.  The problem is that there is no such thing as separation of church and state.  The church is the state and the state is the church which is founded upon evil.
     The best method is to avoid any of these organizations.  They reek of the occult and they seem to always disclose their beliefs by using various satanic symbols and hand gestures.  Just stay away from them as they are intent on destroying themselves.

Related:
Stop Swearing Oaths
Understanding Jurisdiction
Swear an Oath; Tell a Lie


Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land

The Knowledge of Wickedness is Not Wisdom

     I was reading "The Wisdom of Jesus the Son of Sirach,or Ecclesiasticus" and it got me to thinking about the value of studying evil.  I've been a student of history for most of my life, and I may be called a "conspiracy theorist", but in reality, I think the better term for it would be "conspiracy observer".  As I watch current events unfold, my approach is more of an observer than a theorist.  A theory is something that may or may not be true, but in observing history, the theory part goes away and the facts speak for themselves.  Is it worth the time to study evil?
     After doing just that for many years, it is my opinion that it is not worth the effort.  There's too much time being spent on looking at evil, rather than trying to solve the problem.  I'm sure the "powers" don't mind everyone studying their evil but the problem for them comes when someone comes up with an alternative solution to the evil.

     Mankind (not human, I'm not human) operates his life with choices between good and evil.  The only study that I can see is to observe and verify the evil and then stay away from it.  Evil fouls my mind and I can't stand looking at it.  I'm at the point to where I just stay to myself because I don't want to be influenced by other peoples' evil inclinations.  I'm usually not a reclusive person, but lately I'm starting to get used to long periods of being by myself.        I don't get any smarter observing wickedness.  My character is not being built by learning evil.  My character is only improved when I manage to do good things, and leave the evil behind.  Looking at evil unsettles the mind, and being around evil people destroys a peaceful life.  And this is why I am at the point now to where I firmly believe in God, but I have completely rejected most religions.  I just don't think God is that stupid as to come up with so many variations of evil.  I think the religions that I am aware of are completely evil.  Governments are evil as they don't conform to God's commandments.  So there's really no point in studying any of it because it wastes time and the evil gets more attention than just enjoying life within the parameters that God gave mankind.      I try to use all of God's commandments and that is what restrains my own behavior.  This is a part of the natural laws, and we should be paying more attention to them.  Studying evil is like counting all the turds in the cesspool; no thanks.  Believe me, there are times when I get an inclination to break one of them, but through self-control I'm learning how to deal with the temptations.      I am deathly afraid of any religious rituals as I believe that it is quite easy to get caught up in idolatry.  I stay away from "churches" because I don't want to wreck my life.  Because my life is much better working with the commandments.  As I go along, I find it easier to keep them because I'm paying attention as to whether I should do something or not.  I focus my time on things that can do me some good, rather than spending time studying evil.        I agree with this verse in saying that there is no wisdom in the knowledge of wickedness or evil.  There is no point to knowledge of evil other than to know enough to stay away from it.



Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land

Neutered Newt Helped Cause the Economic Collapse

Update:  05/14/16
(I wrote this article about Newt Gingrich almost four years ago when he was running for President.  Now he is being considered as the Vice Presidential nominee under Donald Trump.  Newt is a communist jackass who was or still is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).  It was Newt who was very instrumental in getting NAFTA passed in the Congress.  And Trump is considering this idiot?  This would be a litmus test in my mind to see if Trump is the real deal or if he is just another fake.)
 
 This is a good example about why the "new world order" psychos are planning our future as slaves and serfs.
     There was a big political debate in the early 1990s regarding NAFTA, GATT/WTO because these so-called "free trade" agreements were nothing more than a grand socialist scam.  In fact, you can find the term "free trade" in the Communist Manifesto.  What free trade really means is that free trade will never happen.  American companies who were burdened with high regulation in the United States would simply move their factories to other locations outside of this country causing severe unemployment.  Neutered Newt Gingrich and the "Government" was instrumental in emasculating this country's economy and now he wants to be President.  Other phoney conservatives like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, G. Gordon Liddy, Oliver North,  Michael Reagan, and many others were supporters of these trade agreements.  The power of conservative talk radio was used to push through this stupid agreement over the objections of millions of Americans who knew perfectly well that millions of jobs would be lost.  Limbaugh called us conspiracy "kooks".  Limbaugh was the kook.  And so if you like your unemployment situation, you can thank "conservative" talk radio.  The only conservative radio host that didn't support it was Michael Savage; if my memory serves me correctly.
     NAFTA was the first federal "law" or agreement I had ever read.  I couldn't believe it.  It was like Karl Marx wrote it from the grave.  It was so stupid, ignorant, and evil because it was a communist document that would destroy our economy.  Seeing these stupid bills pass was like watching our whole political system drink the Kool-Aid.   In fact, it hasn't done much good for Mexico either.
     Neutered Newt's NAFTA has emasculated manufacturing and agriculture, leaving more of a consumer economy.  The better setup for an economy is a strong manufacturing, agriculture, and consumer.  The United States was the strongest economy in the world, but now will wallow in decline, especially if this knucklehead becomes President.  Think about it.  Almost 42,000 manufacturing companies left the country leaving millions of people out of jobs.  Then, many of the small farms had to shut down because of unfair competition from Mexico and other countries.  With the high unemployment, consumerism took a big hit and the country is now in a big mess. Thank Neutered Newt, Bill Clinton, who are going around the country looking smart, but are in fact, very stupid.
     When I had my own factory, I produced products with the labor of my workers.  For example,
if I paid a worker $10.00 per hour I had additional costs; medical insurance, FICA, workman's compensation, and other expenses.  That could add up to about $15.00 per hour cost of producing our products.  At the time, I was quoted a price of around $2.00 to $3.00 per hour if I had my products made in Mexico.  If I took those same products to China to be produced, the price at that time was
.29  The economic incentive was to shift our manufacturing out of the country and send our workers home.  I didn't do it but it was tempting.
     Years ago, I really got pissed when I heard Hillary Clinton say that she can't be responsible for every under-capitalized company.  Well, if I could actually pay a worker .29 cents per hour, or even $2-3.00 per hour, I would be more competitive too.  At the time, the minimum wage was around $8.25 per hour.  American companies operating in the United States are operating under a major financial handicap and competitive disadvantage.
     The government, as we know it today, is completely useless, and if Republicans think that Neutered Newt is going to do a good job, just know that he is not capable of it.  He has a proven track record
of utter failure via NAFTA, GATT, and the WTO. He is a communist and as are all of the other "conservative" talk show hosts who supported these stupid trade agreements. Democracy is a system that ensures that the most stupid, evil, and insane politicians will occupy the seats of power, bringing destruction upon itself.  This is truly a kakistocracy which means a government by the worst people.
     In order to have a good economic recovery that produces good jobs, this country will have to restore what was taken.  Manufacturing and agricultural businesses will have to be restored.  If that doesn't happen, we will decline to a condition like we see in Zimbabwe.
     The only government that will work would be one which respects God's commandments.  Which would mean never allowing interest or usury to be used in our financial systems.
     There's not much more adversity this economy can take, and putting Neutered Newt as President will probably finish us off.  As for me, I would not vote for any of these people.  Just let it rot and start over.


Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land






 




 


 

I Wish I Had A Woman as Nice as My Dog

   I was getting out of my car this morning, and my little Yorkie  stuck out her paw and scrapped it on my hand wanting me to pet her. She's so nice.  She does this a lot--though it's a bit annoying when I'm driving--because all she wants is some love and a little attention.  I pet her on the head and she's happy, and will lay down and sleep on a longer trip.
     A dog will give a man unconditional love; whereas, a woman may or may not keep you around depending upon the prevailing winds.  I don't have to buy my dog a food dish lined with jewels.
My dog doesn't get crabby and vicious for no reason because she loves me unconditionally.  My dog doesn't run up a charge account at Macy's, and she doesn't spend $50.00 to do her nails.  My dog doesn't take drugs, drink alcohol, or crash my brand new car.  My dog doesn't stand there and "bitch me out" for not being sensitive to her needs.  All my dog needs is a little love, attention, and her food.  Overall, the quality of life with my dog has far exceeded any relationship I have had with any woman.  If you want to know where you stand with a woman, just run out of money.   If you have a woman that stays with you when you're broke or in a setback, then you have a good one.   The value of any relationship depends upon unconditional love, and that's more evident with my dog.
     My guess is that animals are not subject to evil as people are.  Even wild animals seem to be more behaved than mankind.  Animals don't strap explosives on themselves and then go blow up other animals.  You don't see eagles or vultures flying over the elephants dropping bombs on them.  When was the last time you saw a socialist animal?  Animals don't shave their faces, armpits, or legs, put on makeup, they don't get pierced or get tattoos, take drugs, engage in homosexual activities,  nor do they cross-dress.  You will never see a male lion shave his mane nor his beard in order to look like a female lion.  You don't see them working on their "six pack" (I have a one pack).  You'll never see animals joining the freemasons or other satanic cults.  Animals have more freedom than people.
     So when some of you call a woman a "bitch" think about what you are saying.  The word "bitch" means a female dog.  So if you are going to use the word with its true meaning, you would actually be insulting female dogs, because the dogs have better behavior than many women.  You can blame a lot that on the feminist movement, but also, because men and women refuse to stay within their natural order of life, which are God's commandments.  I would never insult my dog by calling Gloria Allred a "bitch".  I'm trying to maintain a higher standard; I would call her a feminist but not a bitch.  The feminist movement has made many of our women unseemly wenches.  Raise the moral standards, and the problems will subside.  It's not like there's no solution.
     I love my bitch and I don't want to say anything to offend her.  My bitch is sweet, my bitch is lovable, my bitch is kind, my bitch is considerate, and she hardly causes me any trouble.  She doesn't mess with my mind; doesn't say yes today and no tomorrow.  She doesn't tell me she loves me today, but tomorrow she wants a divorce. My dog doesn't pole dance at drunken parties. My dog doesn't pick up "stud muffins" at bars. My dog doesn't make porno films.  My dog doesn't take me to court (you lawyers..don't get any ideas) and she doesn't make any unreasonable demands.  It is a perfect relationship as I don't have to entertain any of her relatives.  My dog is my friend and not my adversary.
    If I was ever to consider getting married again, the woman would have to (at the very least)  rise to the level of the behavior of my beautiful little dog.  Dogs and animals stay within the natural order in which God created; many people do not.



Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land

'Never Stand For The National Anthem Again'

 After his hearing, Jesse Ventura said: "I'll never stand for the national anthem again."  This is a sorry state of affairs, when the former governor of Minnesota makes a statement like this; however, I've felt this way for a long time.  I've never said it, but I think about it quite often.

The reason for Jesse's feelings is that the government, or what is passed off as government, is completely lawless.  They certainly don't follow the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights is meaningless. This cannot be fixed.

If a man ever tries to use the court system this country, he will find it almost completely crooked, unless his case doesn't involve the government.  Going to court is like being in hell and asking the Devil for a glass of water.  There is no relief and there is little to no justice.  In this country, there are numerous instances that show that the operatives in the government do not have any respect for their own rules.  And as a result, there is no remedy for anyone who is offended by any government process.

In the case of the TSA, it is simply another arm of a Gestapo mentality in our government.  The excuse is because of  "national security".  But it is my opinion that the government itself created the conditions for the so-call terrorist threats throughout the world.  The twin towers were obviously blown up.  The only group I'm aware of that could pull off something like that would be a government.  I remember a few years ago, a friend of mine told me that his Russian friend who lived in California, was thinking about going back to Russia to get away from the police state known as the United States.

I used to enjoy going to the airport and going on a trip.  But now, that's the last place I want to go and I refuse to fly commercial.  I don't need to go anywhere that bad to put myself through that nonsense.

The "Government" treats everyone like animals or livestock.  And the people in the government are as a cesspool: the big chunks rise to the top.  You can look no farther than Obama who is still in office even though he shows no valid birth certificate and may have a bogus Social Security number.  He couldn't pass even the most rudimentary security check, yet this knucklehead is still the President.

Reading and studying law is a complete waste of time.  I used to do it for years and years, and I really don't like to read any of it anymore because it doesn't mean anything.  Why read fantasy and try to accomplish something?  Why study something that is not?

Jesse Ventura found out the hard way, just like many of us who have tried to get a remedy in the courts, only to find out they are founded upon evil.

Walter Allen Thompson
http://www.graceofrepentance.com

Teaching and Power: The Fruit of the Tree

      One of the things I've learned over the years is that I have to judge things based upon truth.  If I make a judgement about a person, I have to do it based upon not only what he says, but also, by what he does.  The words attributed to Christ that essentially says that one can tell a tree by its fruit.  I wish I had known how to use this principle earlier in my life, but I'm glad to have been able to learn it.  I'm going to describe how this principle can be put to good use.
     I know that a bad tree cannot give good fruit or a good tree will not produce bad fruit.  If I apply this principle to people that I encounter, I am able to better judge them; mostly by their actions.  I try to never judge a man by his physical appearance with the exception of his face.  I don't look at the face if it is handsome or ugly, but rather, what expressions give away his inner countenance.  I remember meeting a man who had the most sour look on his face.  I took note of it and I always avoided him.  Later, he was caught doing three bank robberies in one day.  I knew by the expressions on his face that this was someone I didn't need to be around. In this case, I was right.
     People who lie always produce bad fruit.  When a person lies to me, he distorts  my own thinking.  That's why I now find politics and religious people so disgusting.  It seems like they aren't happy unless they are lying about something.  Thus, if you find any of them lying to you, there's no reason to engage them any longer.  There really isn't any reason to vote, nor is there any reason to go to their meetings.  Disinformation will always send a person down the wrong road, take the wrong turn, and get to the wrong destination.  The person is the tree; the fruit, in this case, is the lie.  It's a simple concept, but many of us don't use it.  We believe things that people tell us and then we get upset when we find out that someone lied to us.  People are what they do, and all one has to do is to observe it.
     Most governments and religions that I am aware of deserve to be flushed down the toilet.  These organizations are only the false authority for evil people to kill many men, women, and children.  People shouldn't define themselves from these lying despots and false teachers, but should define themselves and their morality from God's commandments; not from men's laws.  As we can see right now given the current events, that with government and religion being the tree, we can see the bad fruit coming forth.

Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land

The Two-Fingered Finger

      One of the things I've noticed about all these jerks in government, religion, and the media is their tendency to use satanic hand signals.  I suppose this is a way the Luciferians warn or disclose to us who they serve.
     Usually, these hand signals are  either the middle finger and the index finger that are formed in the letter V, or the index finger and the little finger are formed into a horned shape.
     I actually appreciate that these people identify themselves right off the bat, so I don't have to find out who they are the hard way.  For instance, in recent photos of Herman Cain, he's giving the two fingered finger with both hands, just like Richard Nixon did back when he was president.  I'm assuming that Herman Cain must be some form of Luciferian or a freemason.
     In fact, there are many public and religious leaders who use these hand symbols and I hope they keep doing it.  I appreciate the disclosure so I can make sure that I can adjust my thinking when I encounter them when I am reading or see them on the internet.  I don't have to waste my time listening to their nonsense or bull shit.
    What are these people accomplishing by giving us the two-fingered finger? I interpret these hand signals as saying that they are arrogant devil-worshipers; they are simply in our faces with this garbage.  It doesn't matter if they are liberal or conservatives; many of them seem to be doing this.  We see actors, Hollywood stars, musicians, and supposedly successful people giving us the two-fingered finger.
    One day I had a Pentecostal freak walk by me and give me the two-fingered finger.  I asked him to stop doing it because it is a satanic symbol, and for him to stick it somewhere else.  As I turned my back and walked away, he started doing it behind my back.
     I was talking with someone about the occult one morning, and I looked down at her hand and she was giving me the two-fingered finger.  Which is very helpful to me because I know now to stay away from people who do it.
     I'm not going to post any of the pictures as they are readily available on the internet.  But these hands signals are a big help to people like me so I know who these people are and to make sure that I stay away from them, nor do I listen to anything that they have to say.  They are worthless wretches and even listening to their drivel can distort the mind.  They are losers and will always be losers as long as they keep serving the desires of Satan.
     That's why it is very important to be consistent in keeping God's commandments that conform to the natural law.  When you see the two-fingered finger, just know that nothing good is going to come from that person.  They have nothing to say that will do you any good.  If they manage to do something good for you, they will twist it into something evil.  The best thing to do is to appreciate the fact that they disclosed to you that they are of the devil and that you no longer need to engage with such people.

Updated: 10/31/15

     When we see these kinds of hand signals, I was told that in the case of the V sign, that is a curse directed at the person receiving it.  These hand signals from what I can tell do indeed seem to put a curse upon the ones receiving them.  The best thing to do is to separate from them and stay away as they will attempt to bring us all down with their stupid nonsense.  These hand signals are also warnings so we should be able to recognize a Satanist when we see one.  Once these people are recognized, the best thing to do is to stand aside and try not to engage them.  If they start asking questions, try not to say anything to them.  The reason is that they will control the conversation by asking the questions.  Remember, you'll be talking to an idiot who is extremely immature.  None of us need these kinds of people in our lives.  They cause nothing but trouble and they should always be avoided.
     When I was in prison, some inmates would flash me this sign and I would call them out on it.  They would back off and then do it again.  I'm thinking this is how they think they are putting curses upon people.  Most people in government and religion are spiritual perverts and anything they say should be taken as the excrement of a male cow.  I've saved myself a lot of trouble by not engaging those people who seem to gravitate toward the occult.  Again, if someone flashes you the two-fingered finger, make sure you stay away from them.  Nothing that they do will get good results.

Update: 06/12/16
Here are some more examples.

Hillary Admits that ISIS was Created by the US Government

Donald J. Trump giving the Two-Fingered Finger

I suspected that the people who vote are going to get fornicated once again.  The only thing that changes is the calendar.

Update: 07/02/16

Roger Stone is an author and former political operative for Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and Donald Trump.  Here, he is being interviewed on the Alex Jones channel and we can see Stone wearing a shirt with the skull and bones emblem.  As I've said before, they always disclose themselves quite publicly.  People who use these symbols are disclosing who they are thus eliminating the need for a lot of research.  Just look for the hand signals or other symbols of evil.
https://youtu.be/id5spWru2Ko
Stone giving the Two-Fingered Finger Nixon Style  Remember, Nixon was a communist but had the public persona of an anti-communist.
Beware of the information you take in when it comes to politicians or their advisors.



Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land


     

To Circumcise or Not to Circumcise

Updated: 07/03/16
   There have been some political controversies regarding circumcision in California.  I hadn't paid much attention to it until I read an article on the internet about how circumcision is "genital mutilation" and that it compromises a man's sexual capacities.  Let's look at the problem in the spiritual sense as I don't know enough about the physical consequences.  To me, the Bible is a spiritual minefield because if you look at the conduct of its proponents, you will find a pagan influence almost every time.  In fact, when I received my Geneva Bible in the mail it had a pagan symbol right on the front cover.   How is it that the so-called Word of God has a pagan symbol on it?   So I cut it out, but I still wonder if there's something I may be missing.  I'm at the point now that I don't trust any writing unless I can confirm it some other way.
     When reading anything, I want to make sure that what I am reading is true and that it makes some kind of sense.  If the commandments say not to worship idols, then I know that it makes sense because there is no profit for me in worshiping anything that is of a lesser standing than God and man.  I also do not want to offend God; avoiding idolatry makes a lot of sense thus I believe the commandment.  I know by natural law that it is wrong to kill another man, steal from him, have sex with his wife, and covet his possessions.  I have a latent knowledge of these things from natural law and discerning between right and wrong.
     I don't think there is any latent knowledge within mankind to cut the foreskin of his baby boy's penis.  It doesn't make any sense to me.  In fact, it is altering what the Creator himself has created.  What would be the purpose of it?  I don't see any purpose.  And if it is done as a religious ritual and it is wrong, then the act of circumcision would be idolatry.  This would definitely offend God.  On the surface of it, it makes sense to avoid circumcision.  But it appears to be a command of God to Abraham: "Let every male among you be circumcised...."  What facts, evidence, or proof that God said this to anyone?  In this case, the Bible is a very bad pacifier loaded with idiocy, contradictions, and outright lies.  I don't believe God would say that and no religious leader has any proof that God said anything, let alone cutting off the foreskin of a little male baby.  The procedure is sick and demented.
     Just as there's no referral of circumcision in the Ten Commandments , there is also no direct referral to the commandment in Leviticus 19:27 which forbids the cutting or altering of a man's beard.  And I suppose the reason for that is because the act of cutting or shaving the beard defiles and alters what God created.  Cutting or shaving the beard would go against natural law which are the boundaries set by the Creator.  The man puts up a false front by shaving and it is effeminate.    I know it because I can see and observe it.  In my opinion, that commandment makes sense because God said through the Mosaic law not to do it.  The writing is supplemental to the natural law.  If both fit, then that's where I set my belief.  But in the case of circumcision, it doesn't make any sense and it directly attacks the masculinity of the man.  And that's the whole point of Satanic doctrine is to attack a man's masculinity.  And it could have the effect of making men sexually dysfunctional. Which would be an article for another day.
     However, we don't have that kind of evidence for the circumcision.  I cannot see any "natural law" reason for this practice, other than that the Bible says to do it.  But the Bible was created by men.  The only way the Bible is useful is to the extent that it sticks to the truth.  What if some pagan just inserted this commandment to circumcise into the Bible? What if some freaked-out freemason or satanist put it in the Bible as a pagan ritual?  How would we know the difference unless we checked it against the natural law?  In fact, if you look at my reasoning about the beard and use of the same criteria on the circumcision, you'll see that there isn't one form of supporting evidence within the boundaries of natural law.  Why would God make men like that and then have some of it cut off after only 8 days?  It doesn't make any sense to me as I consider this issue, and if I had babies again that were boys, I would not have this procedure done.
     Along with the shaving of the beard, circumcision defiles the man and compromises his masculinity.  And that is the whole point of paganism; to destroy what God created.  Circumcision appears to be as useless as infant baptism because the baby is not at the age of reason and he has no say in the matter.   Given the pagan influences in the Judeo/Christian organizations, it wouldn't surprise me that the act of circumcision isn't a valid procedure that came from the Creator.
     My suggestion is that people do some more thinking before they act.  Try to find out whether something is good or evil first; then make the decision.  If you are in doubt, then don't do it.  Set it aside until you get the wisdom on the issue.  You might be surprised to find that some things aren't as they seem.

Hypocrisy
     If you notice in Israel, many of the men do not have beards so it is obvious that they do not obey their own laws.  Most of their leaders have the shaved girly-face.  So, on one had they shave their faces and on the other, they cut the foreskin off of the baby's penis.  That's easy to do to a baby.  Rabbi Icutchapeckeroff has no problem mutilating a baby's penis because some jerk said, "God said it.."  God isn't that stupid and he isn't that cruel.
     The only intelligent thing to do in this case would be to wait until the man grows up and then if he wants a circumcision, then he can make that choice for himself, but to do this to little infant babies is just plain evil.  I don't think God said any of it.

Religion is the source of societal dysfunction
     This is a perfect example of why I do not like religions and I think all of them should be avoided.  There is no shortage of assholes wanting to tell other people what to do when the natural law has plenty of information to make such judgments.  Religion, in my opinion, is the Four-Legged Jackass: Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Hindu.  Those are the main culprits whose aim is to destroy mankind and right now they are doing a good job of it.  I suggest people just separate from them and preserve their sanity.

Related:
Baby Dies During Circumcision

Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land







   

It Don't Get No Stupider Than This

     I never thought there could be a "president" worse than George W. Bush; I was wrong.  Not that I would want to go back to Bush, but I now question the whole system of government.  It seems as though only the most evil and stupid people ascend (or decend..depending on your point of view) to power.
     I thought I had seen everything when I saw the Speaker of the House cry profusely on 60 Minutes.  Here is a man who would be in a position to negotiate major legislation, only to be prone to crying at the drop of a hat.  Think of how much confidence that must instill in the people who follow him.  Of course, he caves in to the President in the budget bill disappointing the well-meaning Tea Party.  However, that should be renamed the Pea Party since Obama wanted Congress to "eat their peas".  Obama got the Republicans to eat their shorts.
     Obama has to be the most intelligent president in recent history.  Think of it.  He becomes president even though he may not be constitutionally qualified because he may have been born in Kenya.  He then produces a counterfeit birth certificate that even the most rank graphic software user could recognize as a fake.  But the guy is still president. He is using a questionable socialist insecurity number, and no one investigates other than a few reporters. Don't sell Obama short; he has his shit together.  He said in his campaign that he wanted to reduce troop commitments but starts two more wars.  He wrecks the economy and then blames George Bush.  Heck, why not blame George Washington?  He discontinues the most successful space program in the Space Shuttle at a time when there is chronic unemployment.  But that's OK, the astronauts can hitch a ride with the Russians.  It don't get no stupider than this.
     Obama is of mixed race: black and white.  But since it is politically convenient, he passes himself off as a black man.  If I use his logic, I could just as easily claim he's a white guy. But he gets away with calling himself black.  You gotta hand it to Obama, there's almost nothing he can't do.  Only Obama could be the first black president when he could just as well claim that he's white.  We could say that Obama is the first black president who is white.  I wonder if Jesse Jackson would cry over that; no doubt Boehner would.  It don't get no stupider than this.
     The only thing dumber than this are the conservative talk show hosts.  Right now, they are criticizing Obama for the high unemployment.  The reason for high unemployment is the unfair trade agreements such as NAFTA and GATT during the Clinton administration.  Limbaugh, Hannity, Liddy, Boortz, and many others all favored these agreements.  Perot warned that there would be a "great sucking sound"  which would be the jobs that would be lost as a result of the trade agreements.  Perot was right.  If you want to attach blame for the unemployment, it couldn't possibly be Obama.  The blame should be put at the feet of conservative talk radio which helped push the socialist agenda under the cover of "conservatism".  If Obama was smart, he would blame the high unemployment on Clinton, Limbaugh, and Hannity.  In this country; if it is political, it is socialist.  It don't get no stupider than this.
     Clinton, Limbaugh, Hannity, and others lead the way to destroy your job.  There will be no recovery because there is not a lot with which to recover.  I suggest that if you want a job, start sending your resume to India, Mexico, or China.  They'll need English speaking employees.  You won't make that much, but their living expenses are lower.  It will all come out in the wash.  Just have your relatives get on a plane to India  for the holidays and you can have your family gatherings in Mumbai.  Employment in the United States is highly overrated.  This is great for tech support people when you buy your Dell computer that was made in China and supported in India.  Just think how happy Dell's customers will be when they learn that a Texan moved to India to support their computers.  It don't get no stupider than this.

Walter Allen Thompson
http://www.verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com