Wednesday, July 6, 2016

Bar Association History and Who Owns the United States


(I found this article from my old blog and I thought this might be of interest to those who wish to study the true lines of authority.  I cannot vouch for the veracity of this piece, but I found it interesting that the Middle Temple is the City of London which now has a Muslim mayor.  I'm not sure if there is any connection, but I find it odd that children in public schools are being taught Islam.  In addition, the "United States" in the USC is a corporation.  It isn't a government in the classic understanding of the government.  This article goes back 13 years and it will give the reader a background on the corrupted legal system that we've experienced with the FBI not indicting the Hildebeast.)

Subject: History of "BAR ASSOCIATIONS" The Crown Temple - Secret Society of the Third Way Order [14 Pages] {THE REAL AMERICAN HISTORY NOT TAUGHT IN SCHOOLS ON THE 227th ANNIVERSARY OF THE FIRST 4th Of July 1776} 

History of "BAR ASSOCIATIONS" The Crown Temple Secret Society of the Third Way Order by Rule of Mystery Babylon. The Templars of the Crown. The governmental and judicial systems within the United States of America, at both federal and local state levels, is owned by the "Crown," which is a private foreign power. 

Before jumping to conclusions about the Queen of England or the Royal Families of Britain owning the U.S.A., this is a different "Crown" and is fully exposed and explained below. We are specifically referencing the established Templar Church, known for centuries by the world as the "Crown." 

From this point on, we will also refer to the Crown as the Crown Temple or Crown Templar, all three being synonymous. First, a little historical background. The Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar in two parts: the Round and the Chancel. The Round Church was consecrated in 1185 and modeled after the circular Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. The Chancel was built in 1240. The Temple Church serves both the Inner and Middle Temples (see below) and is located between Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment at the Thames River. Its grounds also house the Crown Offices at Crown Office Row. 

This Temple "Church" is outside any Canonical jurisdiction. The Master of the Temple is appointed and takes his place by sealed (non-public) patent, without induction or institution. All licensed Bar Attorneys - Attorners (see definitions below) ­ in the U.S. owe their allegiance and give their solemn oath in pledge to the Crown Temple, realizing this or not. This is simply due to the fact that all Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the International Bar Association located at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple, which are physically located at Chancery Lane behind Fleet Street in London. 

Although they vehemently deny it, all Bar Associations in the U.S., such as the American Bar Association, the Florida Bar, or California Bar Association, are franchises to the Crown. The Inns of Court (see below, The Four Inns of Court) to the Crown Temple use the Banking and Judicial system of the City of London - a sovereign and independent territory which is not a part of Great Britain (just as Washington City, as DC was called in the 1800's, is not a part of the north American states, nor is it a state) to defraud, coerce, and manipulate the American people. 

These Fleet Street bankers and lawyers are committing crimes in America under the guise and color of law (see definitions for legal and lawful below). They are known collectively as the "Crown." Their lawyers are actually Templar Bar Attornies, not lawyers. The present Queen of England is not the "Crown," as we have all been led to believe. Rather, it is the Bankers and Attornies (Attorneys) who are the actual Crown or Crown Temple. 

The Monarch aristocrats of England have not been ruling sovereigns since the reign of King John, circa 1215. All royal sovereignty of the old British Crown since that time has passed to the Crown Temple in Chancery. The U.S.A. is not the free and sovereign nation that our federal government tells us it is. If this were true, we would not be dictated to by the Crown Temple through its bankers and attornies. 
The U.S.A. is controlled and manipulated by this private foreign power and our unlawful Federal U.S. Government is their pawn broker. The bankers and Bar Attorneys in the U.S.A. are a franchise in oath and allegiance to the Crown at Chancery - the Crown Temple Church and its Chancel located at Chancery Lane - a manipulative body of elite bankers and attorners from the independent City of London who violate the law in America by imposing fraudulent "legal" - but totally unlawful - contracts on the American people. 

The banks Rule the Temple Church and the Attorners carry out their Orders by controlling their victim's judiciary. Since the first Chancel of the Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar, this is not a new ruling system by any means. The Chancel, or Chancery, of the Crown Inner Temple Court was where King John was, in January 1215, when the English barons demanded that he confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta. 

This City of London Temple was the headquarters of the Templar Knights in Great Britain where Order and Rule were first made, which became known as Code. Remember all these terms, such as Crown, Temple, Templar, Knight, Chancel, Chancery, Court, Code, Order and Rule as we tie together their origins with the present American Temple Bar system of thievery by equity (chancery) contracts. "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness." -Matthew 23:27 

By what authority has the "Crown" usurped the natural sovereignty of the American people? Is it acceptable that the U.S. Supreme Court decides constitutional issues in the U.S.A? How can it be considered in any manner as being "constitutional" when this same Supreme Court is appointed by (not elected) and paid by the Federal U.S. Government? Is it any wonder the states and her people have no justice as they dwell upon the land? As you will soon see, the land called North America belongs to the Crown Temple. The legal system (judiciary) of the U.S.A. is controlled by the Crown Temple from the independent and sovereign City of London. 

The private Federal Reserve System, which issues fiat U.S. Federal Reserve Notes, is financially owned and controlled by the Crown from Switzerland, the home and legal origin for the charters of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and most importantly, the Bank of International Settlements. Even Hitler respected his Crown bankers by not bombing Switzerland. 

The Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland controls all the central banks of the G7 nations. He who controls the gold rules the world. Definitions You Never Knew: 

ATTORN [e-'tern] Anglo-French aturner to transfer (allegiance of a tenant to another lord), from Old French atorner to turn (to), arrange, from a- to + torner to turn: to agree to be the tenant of a new landlord or owner of the same property. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law ©1996. ATTORN, v.i. [L. ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassels or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary. 

ESQUIRE, n. [L. scutum, a shield; Gr. a hide, of which shields were anciently made.], a shield-bearer or armor-bearer, scutifer; an attendant on a knight. Hence in modern times, a title of dignity next in degree below a knight. In England, this title is given to the younger sons of noblemen, to officers of the king's courts and of the household, to counselors at law, justices of the peace, while in commission, sheriffs, and other gentlemen. In the United States, the title is given to public officers of all degrees, from governors down to justices and attorneys. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary. 

RULE, n. [L. regula, from rego, to govern, that is, to stretch, strain or make straight.] 1. Government; sway; empire; control; supreme command or authority. 6. In monasteries, corporations or societies, a law or regulation to be observed by the society and its particular members. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary RULE n. 1 [C] a statement about what must or should be done, (syn.) a regulation. 

REGULATION n. 1 [C] a rule, statement about what can be done and what cannot. 2 [U] the general condition of controlling any part of human life. -Newbury House Dictionary ©1999. CODE n. 1 [C;U] a way of hiding the true meaning of communications from all except those people who have the keys to understand it. 2 [C] a written set of rules of behavior. 3 [C] a formal group of principles or laws. -v. coded, coding, codes to put into code, (syn.) to encode. 

ENCODE v. 1 to change written material into secret symbols. -Newbury House Dictionary ©1999. 

CURTAIN n. [OE. cortin, curtin, fr. OF. cortine, curtine, F. courtine, LL. cortina, also, small court, small inclosure surrounded by walls, from cortis court. See Court.] 4. A flag; an ensign; -- in contempt. [Obs.] Shak. Behind the curtain, in concealment; in secret. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary. 

COURT, n. 3. A palace; the place of residence of a king or sovereign prince. 5. Persons who compose the retinue or council of a king or emperor. 9. The tabernacle had one court; the temple, three. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary. COURT n. 2 the place where a king or queen lives or meets others. -The Newbury House Dictionary ©1999. 

TEMPLAR, n. [from the Temple, a house near the Thames, which originally belonged to the knights Templars. The latter took their denomination from an apartment of the palace of Baldwin II in Jerusalem, near the temple.] 1. A student of the law. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary. 

TEMPLE, n. [L. templum.] 1. A public edifice erected in honor of some deity. Among pagans, a building erected to some pretended deity, and in which the people assembled to worship. Originally, temples were open places, as the Stonehenge in England. 4. In England, the Temples are two inns of court, thus called because anciently the dwellings of the knights Templars. They are called the Inner and the Middle Temple. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary. 

CAPITOL, n. 1. The temple of Jupiter in Rome, and a fort or castle, on the Mons Capitolinus. In this, the Senate of Rome anciently assembled; and on the same place, is still the city hall or town-house, where the conservators of the Romans hold their meetings. The same name was given to the principal temples of the Romans in their colonies. 

INN, n. [Hebrew, To dwell or to pitch a tent.] 2. In England, a college of municipal or common law professors and students; formerly, the town-house of a nobleman, bishop or other distinguished personage, in which he resided when he attended the court. Inns of court, colleges in which students of law reside and are instructed. The principal are the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln's Inn, and Gray's Inn. Inns of chancery, colleges in which young students formerly began their law studies. These are now occupied chiefly by attorneys, solicitors, etc. 

INNER, a. [from in.] Interior; farther inward than something else, as an inner chamber; the inner court of a temple or palace. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary. CROWN, n. 4. Imperial or regal power or dominion; sovereignty. There is a power behind the crown greater than the crown itself. 

Junius. 19. A coin stamped with the image of a crown; hence, a denomination of money; as, the English crown. -- Crown land, land belonging to the crown, that is, to the sovereign. -- Crown law, the law which governs criminal prosecutions. -- Crown lawyer, one employed by the crown, as in criminal cases. v.t. 1. To cover, decorate, or invest with a crown; hence, to invest with royal dignity and power. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary. 

COLONY, n. 1. A company [i.e. legal corporation] or body of people transplanted from their mother country to a remote province or country to cultivate and inhabit it, and remaining subject to the jurisdiction of the parent state; as the British colonies in America or the Indies; the Spanish colonies in South America. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary. 

STATE, n. [L., to stand, to be fixed.] 1. Condition; the circumstances of a being or thing at any given time. These circumstances may be internal, constitutional or peculiar to the being, or they may have relation to other beings. 4. Estate; possession. [See Estate.] -Webster's 1828 Dictionary. 

ESTATE, n. [L. status, from sto, to stand. The roots stb, std and stg, have nearly the same signification, to set, to fix. It is probable that the L. sto is contracted from stad, as it forms steti.] 1.In a general sense, fixedness; a fixed condition; 5. Fortune; possessions; property in general. 6. The general business or interest of government; hence, a political body; a commonwealth; a republic. But in this sense, we now use State. ESTATE, v.t. To settle as a fortune. 1. To establish. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary. 

PATENT, a. [L. patens, from pateo, to open.] 3. Appropriated by letters patent. 4. Apparent; conspicuous. PATENT, n. A writing given by the proper authority and duly authenticated, granting a privilege to some person or persons. By patent, or letters patent, that is, open letters, the king of Great Britain grants lands, honors and franchises. PATENT, v.t. To grant by patent. 1. To secure the exclusive right of a thing to a person. 

LAWFUL. In accordance with the law of the land; according to the law; permitted, sanctioned, or justified by law. "Lawful" properly implies a thing conformable to or enjoined by law; "Legal", a thing in the form or after the manner of law or binding by law. A writ or warrant issuing from any court, under color of law, is a "legal" process however defective. ­ A Dictionary of Law 1893. 

LEGAL. Latin legalis. Pertaining to the understanding, the exposition, the administration, the science and the practice of law: as, the legal profession, legal advice; legal blanks, newspaper. Implied or imputed in law. Opposed to actual. "Legal" looks more to the letter, and "Lawful" to the spirit, of the law. "Legal" is more appropriate for conformity to positive rules of law; "Lawful" for accord with ethical principle. "Legal" imports rather that the forms of law are observed, that the proceeding is correct in method, that rules prescribed have been obeyed; "Lawful" that the right is actful in substance, that moral quality is secured. "Legal" is the antithesis of "equitable", and the equivalent of "constructive". - 2 Abbott's Law Dict. 24; A Dictionary of Law (1893). 

STATUS IN QUO, STATUS QUO. [L., state in which.] The state in which anything is already. The phrase is also used retrospectively, as when, on a treaty of place, matters return to the status quo ante bellum, or are left in statu quo ante bellum, i.e., the state (or, in the state) before the war. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary 

The Four Inns of Court to the unholy Temple Globally, all the legalistic scams promoted by the exclusive monopoly of the Temple Bar and their Bar Association franchises come from four Inns or Temples of Court: the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln's Inn, and Gray's Inn. These Inns/Temples are exclusive and private country clubs; secret societies of world power in commerce. They are well established, some having been founded in the early 1200's. 

The Queen and Queen Mother of England are current members of both the Inner Temple and Middle Temple. Gray's Inn specializes in Taxation legalities by Rule and Code for the Crown. Lincoln's Inn received its name from the Third Earl of Lincoln (circa 1300). Just like all U.S. based franchise Bar Associations, none of the Four Inns of the Temple are incorporated - for a definite and purposeful reason: You can't make claim against a non-entity and a non-being. They are private societies without charters or statutes, and their so-called constitutions are based solely on custom and self-regulation. In other words, they exist as secret societies without a public "front door" unless you're a private member called to their Bar. 

While the Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license to steal from Canada and Great Britain, it is the Middle Temple that has legal license to steal from America. This comes about directly via their Bar Association franchises to the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple through the Crown Temple. From THE HISTORY OF THE INN, Later Centuries, [p.6], written by the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple, we can see a direct tie to the Bar Association franchises and its Crown signatories in America: "Call to the Bar or keeping terms in one of the four Inns a pre-requisite to Call at King's Inns until late in the 19th century. 

In the 17th and 18th centuries, students came from the American colonies and from many of the West Indian islands. The Inn's records would lead one to suppose that for a time there was hardly a young gentleman in Charleston who had not studied here. Five of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence were Middle Templars, and notwithstanding it and its consequences, Americans continued to come here until the War of 1812". All Bar Association licensed Attorneys must keep the terms of their oath to the Crown Temple in order to be accepted or "called to Bar" at any of the King's Inns. 

Their oath, pledge, and terms of allegiance are made to the Crown Temple. It's a real eye opener to know that the Middle Inn of the Crown Temple has publicly acknowledged there were at least five Templar Bar Attornies, under solemn oath only to the Crown, who signed what was alleged to be an American Declaration of Independence. This simply means that both parties to the Declaration agreement were of the same origin, the Crown Temple. In case you don't understand the importance of this, there is no international agreement or treaty that will ever be honored, or will ever have lawful effect, when the same party signs as both the first and second parties. It's merely a worthless piece of paper with no lawful authority when both sides to any agreement are actually the same. In reality, the American Declaration of Independence was nothing more than an internal memo of the Crown Temple made among its private members. 

By example, Alexander Hamilton was one of those numerous Crown Templars who was called to their Bar. In 1774, he entered King's College in New York City, which was funded by members of the London King's Inns, now named Columbia University. In 1777, he became a personal aide and private secretary to George Washington during the American Revolution. In May of 1782, Hamilton began studying law in Albany, New York, and within six months had completed a three year course of studies, passed his examinations, and was admitted to the New York Bar. 

Of course, the New York Bar Association was/is a franchise of the Crown Temple through the Middle Inn. After a year's service in Congress during the 1782-1783 session, he settled down to legal practice in New York City as Alexander Hamilton, Esqr. In February of 1784, he wrote the charter for, and became a founding member of, the Bank of New York, the State's first bank. He secured a place on the New York delegation to the Federal Convention of 1787 at Philadelphia. In a five hour speech on June 18th, he stated "an Executive for life will be an elective Monarch". When all his anti-Federalist New York colleagues withdrew from the Convention in protest, he alone signed the Constitution for the United States of America representing New York State, one of the legal Crown States (Colonies). 

One should particularly notice that a lawful state is made up of the people, but a State is a legal entity of the Crown - a Crown Colony. This is an example of the deceptive ways the Crown Temple - Middle Templars - have taken control of America since the beginning of our settlements. This is explained in further detail below. 

Later, as President Washington's U.S. Treasury Secretary, Hamilton alone laid the foundation of the first Federal U.S. Central Bank, secured credit loans through Crown banks in France and the Netherlands, and increased the power of the Federal Government over the hoodwinked nation-states of the Union. Hamilton had never made a secret of the fact that he admired the government and fiscal policies of Great Britain. Americans were fooled into believing that the legal Crown Colonies comprising New England were independent nation states, but they never were nor are today. They were and still are Colonies of the Crown Temple, through letters patent and charters, who have no legal authority to be independent from the Rule and Order of the Crown Temple. A legal State is a Crown Temple Colony. Neither the American people nor the Queen of Britain own America. 

The Crown Temple owns America through the deception of those who have sworn their allegiance by oath to the Middle Templar Bar. The Crown Bankers and their Middle Templar Attornies Rule America through unlawful contracts, unlawful taxes, and contract documents of false equity through debt deceit, all strictly enforced by their completely unlawful, but 
"legal" Orders, Rules and Codes of the Crown Temple Courts, our This is because the Crown Temple holds the land titles and estate also-called "judiciary" in America deeds to all of North America. 

The biggest lie is what the Crown and its agents refer to as "the rule of law". In reality, it is not about law at all, but solely about the Crown Rule of all nations. For example, just read what President Bush stated on November 13, 2001, regarding the "rule of law:" "Our countries are embarked on a new relationship for the 21st century, founded on a commitment to the values of democracy, the free market, and the rule of law." - Joint Statement by President George W. Bush and President Vladimir V. Putin on 11/13/01, spoken from the White House, Washington D.C. 

What happened in 1776? "Whoever owns the soil, owns all the way to the heavens and to the depths of the earth." - Old Latin maxim and Roman expression. 1776 is the year that will truly live in infamy for all Americans. It is the year that the Crown Colonies became legal Crown States. The Declaration of Independence was a legal, not lawful, document. It was signed on both sides by representatives of the Crown Temple. Legally, it announced the status quo of the Crown Colonies to that of the new legal name called "States" as direct possessive estates of the Crown (see the definitions above to understand the legal trickery that was done). 

The American people were hoodwinked into thinking they were declaring lawful independence from the Crown. Proof that the Colonies are still in Crown possession is the use of the word "State" to signify a "legal estate of possession." Had this been a document of and by the people, both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution would have been written using the word "states". By the use of "State," the significance of a government of estate possession was legally established. All of the North American States are Crown Templar possessions through their legal document, signed by their representation of both parties to the contract, known as the Constitution of the United States of America. 

All "Constitutional Rights" in America are simply those dictated by the Crown Temple and enforced by the Middle Inn Templars (Bar Attorners) through their franchise and corporate government entity, the federal United States Government. When a "State Citizen" attempts to invoke his "constitutional", natural, or common law "rights" in Chancery (equity courts), he is told they don't apply. Why? Simply because a State citizen has no rights outside of the Rule and Codes of Crown "law". 

Only a state citizen has natural and common law rights by the paramount authority of God's Law. The people who comprise the citizenry of a state are recognized only within natural and common law as is already established by God's Law. Only a State Citizen can be a party to an action within a State Court. A common state citizen cannot be recognized in that court because he doesn't legally exist in Crown Chancery Courts. In order to be recognized in their State Courts, the common man must be converted to that of a corporate or legal entity (a legal fiction). 

Now you know why they create such an entity using all capital letters within Birth Certificates issued by the State. They convert the common lawful man of God into a fictional legal entity subject to Administration by State Rules, Orders and Codes (there is no "law" within any Rule or Code). Of course, Rules, Codes, etc. do not apply to the lawful common man of the Lord of lords, so the man with inherent Godly law and rights must be converted into a legal "Person" of fictional "status" (another legal term) in order for their legal - but completely unlawful ­ State Judiciary (Chancery Courts) to have authority over him. Chancery Courts are tribunal courts where the decisions of "justice" are decided by 3 "judges". This is a direct result of the Crown Temple having invoked their Rule and Code over all judicial courts. "It is held to be a settled Rule, that our courts can not take notice of any title to land not derived from the State or Colonial government, and duly verified by patent." -4 Johns. Rep. 163. Jackson v. Waters, 12 Johns. Rep. 365. S.P. 

The Crown Temple was granted Letters Patent (see definition above) and Charters (definition below) for all the land (Colonies) of New England by the King of England, a sworn member of the Middle Temple (as the Queen is now). Since the people were giving the patent/charter corporations and Colonial Governours such a hard time, especially concerning Crown taxation, a scheme was devised to allow the Americans to believe they were being granted "independence." Remember, the Crown Templars represented both parties to the 1776 Declaration of Independence; and, as we are about to see, the latter 1787 U.S. Constitution. 

To have this "Declaration" recognized by international treaty law, and in order to establish the new legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, Middle Templar King George III agreed to the Treaty of Paris on September 3, 1783, "between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States". The Crown of Great Britain legally was, then and now, the Crown Temple. This formally gave international recognition to the corporate "United States", the new Crown Temple States (Colonies). 

Most important is to know who the actual signatories to the Treaty of Paris were. Take particular note to the abbreviation "Esqr." following their names (see above definition for ESQUIRE) as this legally signifies "Officers of the King's Courts", which we now know were Templar Courts or Crown Courts. This is the same Crown Templar Title given to Alexander Hamilton (see above). 

The Crown was represented in signature by "David Hartley, Esqr.", a Middle Templar of the King's Court. Representing the United States (a Crown franchise) by signature was "John Adams, Esqr", "Benjamin Franklin, Esqr." and "John Jay, Esqr." The signatories for the "United States" were also Middle Templars of the King's Court through Bar Association membership. 

What is plainly written in history proves, once again, that the Crown Temple was representing both parties to the agreement. What a perfect and elaborate scam the people of North America had pulled on them! It becomes even more obvious when you read Article 5, which states in part, "to provide for the Restitution of all Estates, Rights, and Properties which have been confiscated, belonging to real British Subjects." 

The Crown Colonies were granted to "persons" and corporations of the Crown Temple through Letters Patent and Charters, and the North American Colonial land was owned by the Crown. Since 1883, the Crown has been receiving "restitution" from the United States, their incorporated Crown franchisee, because the Crown owns the land through paramount and allodial title as a possessory estate. Now, here's a real catch-all in Article 4: "It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted." 

Since the Crown and its Templars represented both the United States, as the debtors, and the Crown, as the creditors, then they became the creditor of the American people by owning all debts of the former Colonies, now called the legal Crown States. This sounds too good to be true, but these are the facts. The words SCAM and HOODWINKED can't begin to describe what had taken place. 

So then, what debts were owed to the Crown Temple and their banks as of 1883? In the Contract Between the King and the Thirteen United States of North America, signed at Versailles July 16, 1782, Article I states, "It is agreed and certified that the sums advanced by His Majesty to the Congress of the United States under the title of a loan, in the years 1778, 1779, 1780, 1781, and the present 1782, amount to the sum of eighteen million of livres, money of France, according to the following twenty-one receipts of the above-mentioned underwritten Minister of Congress, given in virtue of his full powers, to wit." That amount equals about $18 million dollars, plus interest, that Hamilton's U.S. Central Bank owed the Crown through Crown Bank loans in France. This was signed, on behalf of the United States, by an already familiar Middle Templar, Benjamin Franklin, Esquire. An additional $6 million dollars (six million livres) was loaned to the United States at 5% interest by the same parties in a similar Contract signed on February 25, 1783. The Crown Bankers in the Netherlands and France were calling in their debts for payment by future generations of Americans. 

The Fiscal Agents of Mystery Babylon Since its beginnings, the Temple Church at the City of London has been a Knight Templar secret society. It was built and established by the same Temple Knights who were given their Rule and Order by the Roman Pope. It's very important to know how the British Royal Crown was placed into the hands of the Knights Templars, and how the Crown Templars became the fiscal and military agents for the Pope of the Roman Church. This all becomes very clear through the Concession Of England To The Pope on May 15, 1213. This charter was sworn in fealty by England's King John to Pope Innocent and the Roman Church. It was witnessed before the Crown Templars, as King John stated upon sealing the same, "I myself bearing witness in the house of the Knights Templars." 

Pay particular attention to the words being used that we have defined below, especially charter, fealty, demur, and concession: 
We wish it to be known to all of you, through this our charter, furnished with our seal, not induced by force or compelled by fear, but of our own good and spontaneous will and by the common counsel of our barons, do offer and freely concede to God and His holy apostles Peter and Paul and to our mother the holy Roman church, and to our lord pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances. We perform and swear fealty for them to him our aforesaid lord pope Innocent, and his catholic successors and the Roman church, binding our successors and our heirs by our wife forever, in similar manner to perform fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at that time, and to the Roman church without demur. As a sign, we will and establish perpetual obligation and concession from the proper and especial revenues of our aforesaid kingdoms. The Roman church shall receive yearly a thousand marks sterling, saving to us and to our heirs our rights, liberties and regalia; all of which things, as they have been described above, we wish to have perpetually valid and firm; and we bind ourselves and our successors not to act counter to them. And if we or any one of our successors shall presume to attempt this, whoever he be, unless being duly warned he come to his kingdom, and his senses, he shall lose his right to the kingdom, and this charter of our obligation and concession shall always remain firm. 

Most who have commented on this charter only emphasize the payments due the Pope and the Roman Church. What should be emphasized is the fact that King John broke the terms of this charter by signing the Magna Carta on June 15, 1215. Remember; the penalty for breaking the 1213 agreement was the loss of the Crown (right to the kingdom) to the Pope and his Roman Church. It says so quite plainly. 

To formally and lawfully take the Crown from the royal monarchs of England by an act of declaration, on August 24, 1215, Pope Innocent III annulled the Magna Carta; later in the year, he placed an Interdict (prohibition) on the entire British empire. From that time until today, the English monarchy and the entire British Crown belonged to the Pope. The following definitions are all taken from Webster's 1828 Dictionary since the meanings have not been perverted for nearly 200 years: 

FEALTY, n. [L. fidelis.] Fidelity to a lord; faithful adherence of a tenant or vassal to the superior of whom he holds his lands; loyalty.Under the feudal system of tenures, every vassal or tenant was bound to be true and faithful to his lord, and to defend him against all his enemies. This obligation was called his fidelity or fealty, and an oath of fealty was required to be taken by all tenants to their landlords. The tenant was called a liege man; the land, a liege fee; and the superior, liege lord. 

FEE, n. [In English, is loan]. This word, fee, inland, or an estate in trust, originated among the descendants of the northern conquerors of Italy, but it originated in the south of Europe. See Feud.] Primarily, a loan of land, an estate in trust, granted by a prince or lord, to be held by the grantee on condition of personal service, or other condition; and if the grantee or tenant failed to perform the conditions, the land reverted to the lord or donor, called the landlord, or lend-lord, the lord of the loan. 

A fee then is any land or tenement held of a superior on certain conditions. It is synonymous with fief and feud. In the United States, an estate in fee or fee simple is what is called in English law an allodial estate, an estate held by a person in his own right, and descendible to the heirs in general. 

FEUD, n. [L. fides; Eng. loan.] A fief; a fee; a right to lands or he reditaments held in trust, or on the terms of performing certain conditions; the right which a vassal or tenant has to the lands or other immovable thing of his lord, to use the same and take the profits thereof hereditarily, rendering to his superior such duties and services as belong to military tenure, &c., the property of the soil always remaining in the lord or superior. 

By swearing to the 1213 Charter in fealty, King John declared that the British- English Crown and its possessions at that time, including all future possessions, estates, trusts, charters, letters patent, and land, were forever bound to the Pope and the Roman Church, the landlord. Some five hundred years later, the New England Colonies in America became a part of the Crown as a possession and trust named the "United States." 

ATTORNING, ppr. Acknowledging a new lord, or transferring homage and fealty to the purchaser of an estate. 

Bar Attorneys have been attorning ever since they were founded at the Temple Church, by acknowledging that the Crown and he who holds the Crown is the new lord of the land. Because King John defaulted on the 1213 contract, the new Crown (the Crown Temple) had a new lord: The Pope and his Roman Church. 

CHARTER, n. 1. A written instrument, executed with usual forms, given as evidence of a grant, contract, or whatever is done between man and man. In its more usual sense, it is the instrument of a grant conferring powers, rights and privileges, either from a king or other sovereign power, or from a private person, as a charter of exemption, that no person shall be empanelled on a jury, a charter of pardon, &c. 
The charters under which most of the colonies in America were settled, were given by the king of England, and incorporated certain persons, with powers to hold the lands granted, to establish a government, and make laws for their own regulation. These were called charter- governments. By agreeing to the Magna Carta, King John had broken the agreement terms of his fealty with Rome and the Pope. What that means is that he lost all rights to the kingdom, and the royal English Crown was turned over by default to the Pope and the Roman Church. The Pope and his Roman Church control the Crown Temple because his Knights established it under his Orders. So also the Temple Banks, the Templar Attorneys, the corporate United States, the corporate British Commonwealth, the chartered Federal Reserve Bank and Bank of England; the list is nearly endless. He who controls the gold controls the world. The Crown Temple Today The workings of the Crown Temple in this day and age is more so obvious, yet somewhat hidden. 

The Crown Templars have many names and many symbols to signify their private and unholy Temple. Take a close look at the (alleged) one dollar $1 private Federal Reserve System (a Crown banking franchise) Debt Note. Notice in the base of the pyramid the Roman date MDCCLXXVI which is written in Roman numerals for the year 1776. The words ANNUIT COEPTIS NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM are Roman Latin for ANNOUNCING THE BIRTH OF THE NEW ORDER OF THE WORLD. Go back to the definitions above and pay particular attention to the words CAPITOL, CROWN and TEMPLE. 

1776 signifies the birth of the New World Order under the Crown Temple. That's when their American Crown Colonies became the chartered government called the United States, thanks to the Declaration of Independence. Since that date, the United Nations (another legal Crown Temple by charter) rose up and refers to every nation as a State member. Note also that there are 13 layers for the pyramid denoting the 13 chartered Colony-States and that the eye of Osirus, one of many Templar signs used the Temple Illuminati or their Order of the Rose and Order of the Cross. 

The Wizard of Oz = the Crown Temple This is not a mere child's story written by L. Frank Baum. What symbol does "Oz" stand for? Ounces. What is measured in ounces? Gold. What is the yellow brick road? Bricks or ingot bars of gold. 

The character known as the Straw Man represents that fictitious ALL CAPS legal fiction - a PERSON - the Federal U.S. Government created with the same spelling as your Christian birth name. Remember what the Straw Man wanted from the Wizard of Oz? A brain! No legal fiction has a brain because they have no breath of life! What did he get in place of a brain? A Certificate. A Birth Certificate for a new legal creation. He was proud of his new legal status, plus all the other legalisms he was granted. Now he becomes the true epitome of the brainless sack of straw who was given a Certificate in place of a brain of common sense. 

What about the Tin Man? Does Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) mean anything to you? The poor TIN Man just stood there mindlessly doing his work until his body literally froze up and stopped functioning. He worked himself to death because he had no heart nor soul. He's the heartless and emotionless creature robotically carrying out his daily task as if he was already dead. He's the ox pulling the plow and the mule toiling under the yoke. These days, his task masters just oil him nightly with beer and place him in front of a hypnotic television until his very existence no longer has any meaning or value. His masters keep him cold on the outside and heartless on the inside in order to control any emotions or heart he may get a hold of. The pitiful Cowardly Lion was always too frightened to stand up for himself. Of course, he was a bully and a big mouth when it came to picking on those smaller than he was. Did you ever notice how bullies are really the biggest cowards? They act as if they have great courage, but they really have none at all. All roar with no teeth of authority to back them up. When push came to shove, the Cowardly Lion always buckled under and whimpered when anyone of any size or stature challenged him. He wanted courage from the Grand Wizard, so he was awarded a medal of "official" recognition. Now, regardless of how much of a coward he still was, his official status made him a bully with officially recognized authority. He's just like the Attorneys who hide behind the Middle Courts of the Temple Bar. 

What about the trip through the field of poppies? Notice how it never affected the Straw Man (no brain) or the TIN Man (no heart or soul)? They weren't real people, so drugs had no effect on them. The Wizard of Oz was written at the turn of the century, so how could the author have known America was going to be drugged? The Crown has been playing the drug cartel game for centuries. Just look up the history of Hong Kong and the Opium Wars. The Crown already had valuable experience conquering all of China with drugs, so why not the rest of the world? 

Who finally exposed the Wizard for what he really was? Toto, the ugly (or cute, depending on your perspective) and somewhat annoying little dog. Toto means "in total, all together; Latin in toto." Notice how Toto was not scared of the Great Wizard's theatrics, yet he was so small in size compared to the Wizard, no-one seemed to notice him. The smoke, flames and hologram images were designed to frighten people into doing as the Great Wizard of Oz commanded. Toto simply went over, looked behind the curtain ­ the court - (see the definition for curtain above), saw it was a scam, and started barking until others paid attention to him and came to see what all the barking was about. 

Who was behind the curtain? Just an ordinary person controlling the levers that created the illusions of the Great Wizard's power and authority. When Toto pulled back the curtain to completely expose him, the charade was over. The veil hiding the corporate legal fiction and its false courts was removed. The Wizard's game was up. It's too bad that people don't realize how loud a bark from a little dog is. How about your bark? 

Do you just remain silent and wait to be given whatever food and recognition, if any, your legal master gives you? Let's not forget those pesky flying monkeys. What a perfect mythical creature to symbolize the Bar Association Attorners who attack and control all the little people for the Great Crown Wizard, the powerful and grand Bankers of Oz - Gold. What is it going to take to expose the Wizard and tear down the court veil for what they really are? Each of us needs only a brain, a heart and soul, and courage. Then, and most importantly, we all need to learn how to work together. Only "in toto," working together as one Body of the King of Kings, can we ever be free or have the freedom given under God's Law. 

Mystery Babylon Revealed. There is no mystery behind the current abomination of Babylon for those who discern His Truth: And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. -Revelation 17:5 God has reserved His judgment for the great idolatress, Rome, the chief seat of all idolatry, that rules over many nations with whom the kings have committed to the worship of her idols (see Revelation 17:1-4). The Pope and His purported Church; sitting on the Temple throne at the Vatican; ruling the nations of the earth through the Crown Temple of ungodly deities are the Rule and Order of Babylon; the Crown of godlessness and the Code of commerce. 

One may call the Rule of the world today by many names: The New World Order (a Bush family favourite), the Third Way (spoken by Tony Blair and Bill Clinton), the Illuminati, Triad, Triangle, Trinity, Masonry, the United Nations, the EU, the US, or many dozens of other names. However, they all point to one origin and one beginning. 

We have traced this in history to the Crown Temple, the Temple Church circa 1200. All world banking, judiciary, and rule of "law" has been under the Rule and Order of the Crown Temple since that time. Because the Pope created the Order of the Temple Knights (the Grand Wizards of deception) and established their mighty Temple Church in the sovereign City of London, it is the Pope and his Roman Capitols who control the world. "And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication" -Revelation 17:4 This verse appears to be an accurate description of the Pope and His Bishops for the past 1,700 years. The idolatries of commerce in the world: all the gold and silver; the iron and soft metals; the money and coins and riches of the world: All of these are under the control of the Crown Temple; the Roman King and his false Church; the throne of Babylon; attended to by his Templar Knights, the Wizards of abomination and idolatry. "The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman [mother of harlots] sitteth" - Revelation 17:9 The only mention of "seven mountains" within our present-day Bible is at Revelation 17:9, so it's no wonder this has been a mystery to the current Body of Christ. 

The 1611 King James (who was a Crown Templar) Bible is not the entire canon of the early church ("church" in Latin ecclesia; in Greek ekklesia). There were other gospels and books that have been forbidden by the Papal Throne at Rome since the third century. Greek and Aramaic copies of the "unapproved writings" were sought after and destroyed by Rome. This in itself is no mystery as history records the existence and destruction of these early church writings; just as history has now proven their genuine authenticity with the appearance of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the coptic library at Nag Hagmadi in Egypt, among many other recent Greek language discoveries within the past 100 years. 

The current Holy Bible quotes the Book of Enoch numerous times: By faith Enoch was taken away so that he did not see death, "and was not found, because God had taken him"; for before he was taken he had this testimony, that he pleased God. - Hebrews 11:5 Now Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied about these men also, saying, "Behold, the Lord comes with ten thousands of His saints, to execute judgment on all, to convict all who are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have committed in an ungodly way, and of all the harsh things which ungodly sinners have spoken against Him." - Jude 1:14-15. 

The Book of Enoch was considered scripture by most early Christians. The earliest literature of the so-called "Church Fathers" is filled with references to this mysterious book. The second century Epistle of Barnabus makes much use of the Book of Enoch. Second and Third Century "Church Fathers," such as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Origin and Clement of Alexandria, all make use of the Book of Enoch. Tertullian (160-230 C.E) even called the Book of Enoch "Holy Scripture". The Ethiopic Church included the Book of Enoch to its official canon. It was widely known and read the first three centuries after Christ. However, this and many other books became discredited after the Roman Council of Laodicea. Being under ban of the Roman Papal authorities, afterwards they gradually passed out of circulation. 

At about the time of the Protestant Reformation, there was a renewed interest in the Book of Enoch, which had long since been lost to the modern world. By the late 1400's, rumors began to spread that a copy of the long lost Book of Enoch might still exist. During this time, many books arose claiming to be the lost book but were later found to be forgeries. The return of the Book of Enoch to the modern western world is credited to the famous explorer James Bruce, who in 1773 returned from six years in Abyssinia with three Ethiopic copies of the lost book. In 1821, Richard Laurence published the first English translation. The now famous R.H. Charles edition was first published by Oxford Press in 1912. In the following years, several portions of the Greek text also surfaced. Then, with the discovery of cave number four of the Dead Sea Scrolls, seven fragmentary copies of the Aramaic text were discovered. 

Within the Book of Enoch is revealed one of the mysteries of Babylon concerning the seven mountains she sits upon (underlining has been added): [CHAPTER 52] 2 There mine eyes saw all the secret things of heaven that shall be; a mountain of iron, a mountain of copper, a mountain of silver, a mountain of gold, a mountain of soft metal, and a mountain of lead. 6 These [6] mountains which thine eyes have seen: The mountain of iron, the mountain of copper, the mountain of silver, the mountain of gold, the mountain of soft metal, and the mountain of lead. All these shall be in the presence of the Elect One as wax: Before the fire, like the water which streams down from above upon those mountains, and they shall become powerless before his feet. 7 It shall come to pass in those days that none shall be saved, either by gold or by silver, and none be able to escape. 8 There shall be no iron for war, nor shall one clothe oneself with a breastplate. Bronze shall be of no service, tin shall be of no service and shall not be esteemed, and lead shall not be desired. 9 All these things shall be denied and destroyed from the surface of the earth when the Elect One shall appear before the face of the Lord of Spirits.' [CHAPTER 24] 3 The seventh mountain was in the midst of these, and it excelled them in height, resembling the seat of a throne; and fragrant trees encircled the throne. [CHAPTER 25] 3 And he answered saying: 'This high mountain which thou hast seen, whose summit is like the throne of God, is His throne, where the Holy Great One, the Lord of Glory, the Eternal King, will sit, when He shall come down to visit the earth with goodness. 4 As for this fragrant tree, no mortal is permitted to touch it until the great judgement when He shall take vengeance on all and bring (everything) to its consummation for ever. 5 It shall then be given to the righteous and Holy. Its fruit shall be for food to the elect: It shall be transplanted to the Holy place, to the temple of the Lord, the Eternal King. 6 Then shall they rejoice with joy and be glad, and into the Holy place shall they enter; its fragrance shall be in their bones and they shall live a long life on earth, such as thy fathers lived: In their days shall no sorrow, or plague, or torment, or calamity touch them.' 

The present wealth and power of all the world's gold, silver, tin, bronze, pearls, diamonds, gemstones, iron, and copper belonging the Babylon whore, and held in the treasuries of her Crown Templar banks and deep stony vaults, will not be able to save them at the time of the Lord's judgment. But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in [yourselves], neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. ­ Matthew 23:13 

Where do we go from here? Now that their false Temple has been exposed, how does this apply to the Kingdom of Heaven? To reach the end, you must know the beginning. For everything ordained of God, there is an imitation ordained of evil that looks like the genuine thing. There is the knowledge of good and the knowledge of evil. The problem is, most believe they have the knowledge of God when what they really have is knowledge of world deceptions operating as gods. Where there is the true Tabernacle or Temple of God, there are also the false Temples of unholy gods. The only way to discern and begin to understand the Kingdom of Heaven is to seek the Knowledge that comes only from God, not the knowledge of men who take their legal claim as earthly rulers and gods. 

The false Crown Temple and its Grand Wizard Knights have led the world to believe that they are of the Lord God and hold the knowledge and keys to His Kingdom. What they hold within their Temples are the opposite. They claim to be the "Holy Church," but which holy church? The real one or the false one? Are the Pope and his Roman Church the Temple of God, or is this the unholy Temple of Babylon sitting upon the seven mountains? They use the same words, but alter them to show the true meaning they have applied: The State is not a state; a Certificate is not a certification. The Roman Church is not the church (ekklesia). There is the Crown of the Lord; and a Crown of that which is not of the Lord. There is the mark and seal of the Lord God; and there are the Marks and Seals of the false gods. All imitations appear to be the genuine article, but they are fakes. 

Those who are truly seeking the genuine Kingdom of God must allow the Lord to show them the discernment between the genuine and the imitation. Without this discernment by the Holy Spirit, all will remain fooled by the illusions of false deity emanating from the unholy spirits of the Wizards. Neither shall they say, Lo here! Or, lo there! For behold, the kingdom of God is within you. - Luke 17:21 Jesus said, "If your leaders say to you, 'Look, the (Father's) kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will precede you. Rather, the FATHER'S kingdom is within you and it is outside you. ­ Gospel of Thomas 3 Don't you know that you are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God lives in you? ­ 1 Corinthians 3:16 Jesus said, 'Know what is in front of your face, and what is hidden from you will be disclosed to you. For there is nothing hidden that will not be revealed. [And there is nothing buried that will not be raised."] ­ Gospel of Thomas 5 


Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land

Tuesday, July 5, 2016

Of the Devil, For the Devil, and by the Devil

     The FBI director, James Comey, has just announced that Hillary Clinton will not be indicted regarding her email scandal.  Obviously, this decision was rigged from the beginning.  I heard one pundit state that the government intentionally dragged this out in order to torment the people.  They made it look like she may be indicted, but then at the last minute, they actually disclosed that the thing was fixed.  Bill Clinton met with Attorney General Loretta Lynch for thirty minutes a few days before Hillary was going to be questioned by the FBI.  My guess is that the pundit who said it was intended to be dragged out was to traumatize the American public, especially those who value the "rule of law"  was spot on in my opinion.  Remember, the main tool of the Devil is to lie, and there was no shortage of lies in this instance. Remember, the evil will not divide against itself, and this incident regarding the Clintons is a perfect example of it.  In fact, the federal government deserves no respect and it cannot be trusted with anything.  The federal government is completely immoral and it is evil on purpose.  It is there to conquer and confiscate and it has no interest in the welfare of the public-at-large.  This is why they lie, but this has been going on for at lease 240 years and it won't stop until the government is abolished or implodes under its own corruption.

The Constitution and oath-taking
     If any document has an oath attached to it, you can be sure it is going to fail to provide any benefits for the people.  Oath-taking is something I've commented on extensively on this blog.  There is nothing good about oath-taking and this is the primary reason for the failure of society in general.  To swear an oath puts an action on the dark side.  Anything that will follow the path of the oath is always going to have a bad result.  People who swear oaths are liars and Comey's remarks are a perfect example of that.  Just listening to what he had to say didn't make any sense.  But it doesn't matter because they will not divide against their own evil.
      The legal system, under the Constitution, is completely corrupted.  The so-called leaders of many decades ago are even more corrupted than the Clintons.  Back in the late 1860s and early 1870s they even got rid of the original 13th Amendment which stated that people with titles of nobility would cease to be citizens of the United States. (Notice on the link that the 14th Amendment was the one about involuntary servitude and slavery.) This would completely eliminate the esquire attorneys as they operate with the title of nobility called esquire.  The "emancipation" amendment was the original 14th Amendment.  They simply removed the original 13th Amendment, made the original 14th Amendment the 13th Amendment, and then put in the abomination called the 14th Amendment into place which completely restructured the government.  I suggest that the reader reread this carefully so that you understand it completely.  So you think Hillary Clinton is bad, she's just an amateur in comparison with the public officials that existed just after the Civil War.  In other words, the whole government is a complete fraud.  There was not constitutional convention and no public hearings in Congress to show this was what they were going to do.  So, when the powers-that-be don't like the laws, they just rewrite them and then use their counterfeits as law.  The government that we have today is a big fraud with no authority other than guns and ammo.  What Hillary Clinton did with the emails is really not a big deal in comparison with the shifting and counterfeiting of constitutional amendments.  But what else would anyone expect from a bunch of Satanists and freemasons?  Again, they lie.  They lie on the public record.  I've even seen them alter court transcripts to get the text to say what they want it to say.  This is called in court circles "sanitizing."

The government from hell
     Truly, the government is an institution that deserves no respect because they use the lie to manipulate the thinking of the people.  Little that they say is the truth, and even if they do tell the truth, it will be twisted to fit their own agenda.  No government under the natural law would be much better but there would have to be more moral people to make that happen.  So, as it stands, the government is so corrupted that I don't see how any honorable man or woman could work for such an evil organization.  The FBI director Comey destroyed any confidence that the people may have had in their government and that may be a good thing.  Now the public knows for sure it's crooked and this incident with the Clintons should remove all doubt.  It is truly a government of the Devil, for the Devil, and by the Devil.


Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land


Saturday, June 25, 2016

Vulgar Western Dog Owners

     I ran across a disgusting article about Iranian "authorities" taking dogs away from Iranian families because some local official says that it is "haram" to keep and care for a dog.  I was told once by a man I worked with who was from Morocco; he said that the dogs usually will bark at Arabs.  Dogs can pick up on assholes almost instantaneously.  My dog is especially good at it and he keeps people away from me that he doesn't like.  But Iranian "authorities" need to find something else better to do than to persecute dog owners.

Dogs are better behaved than people, especially rag heads
     One has to be a real dip-shit not to be liked by any dog.  Dogs are the most friendly creatures on earth, but it does make sense to me that the Arabs or Muslims don't like them.  Obviously, according to this article, there are a lot of Arabs and Muslims who do love dogs but they have to put up with the religious authorities governing every aspect of their lives.  This needs to stop. The govtards from all over the world should have shock collars put on them and when they get out of line, they should be zapped and then sent to Cuba.  A dog will generally love anyone and that is a great gift from God to have a nice dog as a companion.  In a world full of religious assholes, a dog is a nice change from the evil people.

Quality of a dog's behavior
     Every dog I've had always loved me.  I can tell.  It's the little things that a dog does that let you know that they love you.  When I'm driving my car, he sits on the center divider and leans into me, or he sits on the floor with part of his body on top of my foot if I'm sitting at the computer.  I remember a man saying: "If you want true love, get a dog."  He is correct, a dog will give a man or woman unconditional love.  This idiot Iranian official has put these families through hell by taking away their dogs.  People love their dogs, as they provide something that most people cannot give anymore, and that is love.  You'll never see a dog strapping a bomb on himself and then going into a group and blowing himself up.  But you will certainly see a lot of that done by the idiot ragheads.  They think they'll go to heaven and get seven virgins when they will probably go to hell instead.

Islam is just a nasty version of Judaism
     Islam is a very nasty religion that has its roots in Judaism. There are very violent threats against the "infidels"; cutting off their heads.  Of course, I don't like any religion because I think the leaders are a bunch of creeps that need adult supervision.   In addition, there are a lot of Satanists and Freemasons involved in these religions.  It doesn't matter which one we're talking about: Judaism, Islam, or Christianity.  These religions as they stand today serve the principles of Satan and not of God.  It's best to preserve one's mind and separate from them before they drive a person into utter madness.  This example of stealing a family's dog is a perfect example of the evil of the government and the religion.

The purpose of evil
     The whole purpose of evil people is to destroy the joy of living of other people.  That is the intent of the governments and the religions.  They want to take everything that is worth living for and then corrupting it for their own advantage.  This is why people all over the world hate their governments and they think that their public officials are always full of crap.  This incident of stealing the family dog is a perfect example of the idiocy of government and religion.

Related:
I Wish I Had a Woman as Nice as My Dog


Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land




Wednesday, June 22, 2016

Islam Taught in Public Schools

     Way back in 1997 a very disturbing incident happened involving my older son.  He was being taught the "Haj" and they were imitating that religious ritual.  I wonder why this was going on but I just wanted to get him out of that school before they really screwed him up.  Now, his children are being taught that "Islam is the perfect religion."  I've done a search on this subject and I see that many people are concerned about this but don't really understand what is going on.

Has the government been taken over by Islam?
     The religious people are the most disgusting perverts and intolerable assholes the world has ever known.  Islam is no exception.  Islam belongs to people mostly in the Middle East, but it has spread quite prolifically within the last twenty years.  I've asked writers from other websites about this and I haven't received any answers so I'll come up with my own theory.

Will Islam start the next civil war?
     The only reason to teach Islam in the public schools is to turn the children's minds into the acceptance of Islam.  Islam is a very aggressive religion that does not tolerate the infidels; i.e. non-believers in Allah or Islam.  Most people in the United States identify with Christianity but it seems as though there is not much opposition to the teaching of Islam in the public schools.  With the refugees coming in from various places, I can see that an eventual civil war may take place which is being instigated by the governments; both state and federal.  American troops would probably be unwilling to shoot their own people but the Muslims have no problem with that.  As you can see, Muslims are just like any other religious group and if you disagree with their version of God, they will kill you.  These refugees, mostly men of a young age, will be more than willing to kill as many Americans because someone will tell them that Allah told them to do it.

Has Islam taken over the United States government?
     There's a reason Obama or Clinton won't use the words "radical Islamic" extremists.  They are afraid of something.  Could it be that the plan of this nation government is to convert everyone over to Islam?  If they are teaching this religion in the public schools, the only reason would be to twist the minds of the young people.  When the timing is right, the country could explode into a civil war that no one wants.  Why do members of other religions object?  My guess is that Judaism, Islam, and Christianity are based upon the same Abrahamic foundation which may or may not be true.  Given the poor quality of people within these religions, I can see why these other religions don't object.  Because they are cut out of the cloth of the Abrahamic foundation which unfortunately has not produced good results in world history.

Children should be homeschooled and people should separate from religion 
     After spending 25 years reading the Bible and other religious material, it is my opinion that people should separate from religion until they can find out the truth.  The truth will not be residing in any religion.  I still believe in God but I don't trust any religion as they are liars and they are deceitful.  This is also why children should be homeschooled.  Given the recent terrorist events throughout the world, it seems to me that all religions are culpable and the Muslims may be the cannon fodder for other religions in any coming civil war.  In other words, the Muslims will get screwed by being used by other religions.  I think it is best to just stay away from all of this nonsense if for no other reason than to preserve your sanity.

Request
     I'm putting out this theory because I'm basing it on what I can readily see.  If anyone has more information as to why Islam is being taught in the public school system, I would greatly appreciate it.  Please leave your comments in the comment section at the bottom of this article.  I moderate the comments, so I would like to have any other information on this subject matter.  If you don't want me to publish your comment, please put "Don't Post" and I will not post it.

Related:
School Takes Christian Children to Mosques  Updated 12/30/16
/
Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land/

Stupid has Strength in Numbers


It's easy to be stupid
     When we look at voting results, we see the idiocy of the people by the politicians and the religious they choose to follow.  The idiots mind is much easier to maintain because it takes little to no effort to be stupid.  To be smart take time and effort to learn those things that might actually be a benefit to a man.  But stupid is easy.  All it takes is to sit on one's fat ass and expect someone else to handle your problems.  A lawyer is a good example of this.  Christ has been reported as saying to them: "Woe unto you lawyers...." and he even called them "...a brood of vipers."  Now, isn't it stupid to have a viper or a poisonous snake handle your affairs or speak for you?  The reason lawyers are so successful is that they get the complete trust of their victim, and if the lawyer does a shitty job, the client goes to jail and not the lawyer.  If the client is really stupid, he may pay the lawyer millions of dollars for the privilege of going to prison.  This is one example of stupid.  But it would take an effort to learn the ins and outs of the court system and to learn to file their own paperwork.
     Usually, stupid people have bad grammar, spelling, and cannot write much past the level of Dick and Jane and see Spot run.  In my opinion, stupid is self-inflicted but with some effort,  it can be defeated.

Stupid cannot be fixed
     Stupid cannot be fixed.  Just like the comedian Ron White said:  "You can't fix stupid."  Most people would agree that a communist political and economic system is just plain stupid.  You can't fix it. I never thought that a comedian's words would ring so true.  Not even Donald Trump can fix a stupid government should he get elected.  Hillary and her husband is a part of the reasons why the government is stupid.  The government's stupidity is "forever."  But the idiots flock to the polls every few years to elect their dummies to represent them in a very stupid system.  In addition to being very stupid, the government is also very evil.  Again, stupid has its strength in numbers.

These are the stupid things people do to destroy their lives
  • Elect communists, socialists, and fascists into their governments
  • Tolerate communists, socialists, and fascists
  • Allow themselves to be persecuted by the LGBT movement
  • Allow their children to be influenced by LGBT
  • Purchase home which they do not really own
  • Engage in promiscuous sex
  • Allow themselves to be treated like animals in a zoo
  • Ruin their lives with divorce
  • Taking drugs and engaging in substance abuse
  • Putting tattoos on their bodies thus destroying their appearance
  • Making war
  • Running up debt
The list goes on and on but the common denominator is that these things take a little effort to do because they are stupid.  And this is why the governments and the religions like to keep people stupid.  If they keep them stupid with their idiotic lies, they can control them for their own purposes.

Take control of your life by not being stupid
     When making decisions, it is important to make the effort to not make stupid decisions.  Have the patience to wait and think something through.  I would have saved myself a lot of problems if I had only taken the time to think things through to their most sensible conclusions.

Conclusion
     Stupid people chose it for themselves and there's no other way to remedy stupid other than to separate from it.  All of us do stupid things because we haven't taken the time to use right reason and common sense.  By taking a little more time and thought we can all make better decisions for ourselves and our families.  Remember, it takes no effort to remain stupid.  In order to be good as something, takes time and patience to make it happen.
     The main thing to remember is that the people in political and religious circles will manipulate you by lies using your stupidity against you.

Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land



Monday, June 20, 2016

Religion:Tolerating the Intolerable


Islamophobia
     It is a natural reaction for people to be alert when around Muslims or followers of Islam.  It is not the religion of peace and neither are any of the other religions that I know.  Both the bible and the Quran or Koran are very violent writings not fit to be read by the sane mind.  I'm not going to document that last statement because I don't want that trash on my website.  Just type in the appropriate search term in your favorite search engine: "Violent writings of the Bible and Koran " and you get all of the evidence you need.  There are legitimate concerns of the people as the refugees are starting to pollute society with their religion and violent behavior.  But the government doesn't care and I believe that they are intentionally attempting to start another civil war by their religious race-baiting using Muslims, Christians, Jews, and other religions against each other.  The best way to get otherwise normal people to kill someone else is to tell them that God or Allah told them to do it.

Islam is being taught in the American public school system
     For those of you who care, your children are probably being taught Islam in the public school system.  Around 1997, my son came home and asked me about the "Haj."  The schools had him participating in Islamic religious rituals in 8th grade.  Recently, that same son told me that his children who were going to public school were taught that Islam is the "perfect" religion.
Obviously, this would be a problem for most "Christians" but they are so milk-toast that it probably doesn't make an impression on them.  But there has been a concerted effort by the government to push Islam on the public school system.  Anyone with any morals should never send their children to public school for this reason alone.

All religions are of the Devil
     Islam has nothing on the so-called "Christian" religions.  The Roman Catholic church is probably the worst except for Judaism itself.  In fact, there are a lot of writings on the internet that say that the Roman Catholic church actually started Islam through the evil works of the Jesuits.  Again, I'm not going to post that trash on my blog, but you can do a web search asking the question: Did the Catholic Church and the Jesuits start Islam?  There you can get all the opinions that you want but what I look for is the underlying Satanic principles in all religions.  To be clear, I believe in the God who created the heavens, the earth, and all that live in them.  But I do not believe in religion any longer as I use the natural law which God created.  The lowest common denominator of these evil religions is the oath in swearing allegiance to their "faith."  Swearing oaths take  God's name in vain and no one on earth should be swearing them.  I think religious writings are too dangerous to use and I see a lot of problems with all religions.  All I have to see is the type of people they produce.  Having gone to many "Christian" churches, I haven't found one which stayed with the biblical teachings.  That leads me to believe that all of the Christian faiths are either apostate or they are pagan, either way, they are useless.  I don't have a problem with any religion if they are true, but the problem is that all religious leaders lie.  And the lie is the main tool of the Devil.
     I sat down with the Quran-Koran and I stopped reading it as I found "cut off the heads of the infidels" quite offensive.  I refuse to put that kind of thing in my mind as I don't want to delude my own soul.  The religions are the main instrument in getting people to kill each other.

Religions violate the natural law
     Again, the primary tool of religions is the lie.  Once someone has the false information and they take action based on false information, then chaos follows.  All actions taken upon false information will never produce good results.  So the main tool of religions is the lie, and the biggest one is: "God said it," or "God said it to me...."  Then, they write down this garbage and point to the bible and say: "That's the word of God."  Again, Muslims have nothing on the Christians when it comes to bullshit.  Then, Christians are to believe that the bible is the word of God when the religious leaders change the contents of the bible via new versions or by simply removing those writings that they don't want.  
     Then there are the Jews or Judaism which is the basic Satanic foundation that Christians or gentiles use.  Islam is also an offshoot of Judaism.  All of these religions produce bad people who violate God's commandments on a regular basis.

Natural law is easier to use than religion
     The moral order is contained in nature and it can be said in a few sentences.  It would be stupid to worship a false God as there is no point in it.  It is wrong to take the name of God in vain (oath-taking) and it is important for children to respect their parents.  It is obvious that killing another man or woman by committing murder is wrong, yet the governments and the religions engage in murder every day.  Adultery and fornication are wrong along with homosexuality.  Given the fact that the governments support LGBT should tell anyone that these governments are demonic and Satanic.  It is always good procedure to never lie, steal, or covet anyone's property.  These are the main items which there are other laws that can be deduced by nature.  I believe that the natural moral order has enough that can be deduced by right reason and common sense that a man can live in prosperity and in peace if the natural moral order is followed.  Right and wrong can be known by using critical thinking.  There may be times where we are not sure, but using patience and proper reasoning will always get the correct answer.
     I believe that the religions of the world are there to cause trouble and not to solve any problems for mankind.  Take away religions and most of the wars would stop.
     Religion is stupid and intolerable.  I don't think God approves of any of it.  I used to be a "Christian" but I had never found a viable Christian church.  A group of religious beliefs that cannot support its own doctrine has to be false.  From the Roman Catholic church to the most fundamental church all have one thing in common: they lie.  To be a part of these groups will twist the mind and the soul.  Judaism, Islam, and Christianity are all evil in substance and the results of these groups are self-evident.  All of these religions are playing a dangerous game of "Follow the Idiot."   Instead of following God's natural laws, men want to follow idiots who cannot do them any good.  
     In using natural law, I don't get the clutter and inconsistencies that I received from religions.  Religions are places that cause trouble among men.  None of these religions should be tolerated by people using right reason and common sense.

Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land

Tuesday, June 14, 2016

Suicidal Marketing 5.0 Urban Bean Coffee Shops


     I always enjoy posting the decisions of small and large business that are destined to be a financial disaster.  Suicidal Marketing 5.0 is another great example of taking a perfectly good business and running it into the ground in a short period of time.  Most of this suicidal marketing is regarding homosexual and LGBT issues.  Most people are heterosexuals (the horror!!) and they don't give a rat's ass about homos, queers, Rump Rangers, Fudge Packers, lesbian, or transgenders (genital mutilators.)  In this case, Urban Bean Coffee Shop  is angry at Donald Trump calling him a "moron" and they are requesting that if anyone is a Trump supporter, they should take their business elsewhere as they don't want their money.  And I'm sure this is exactly what's going to happen.  I'll give them about 6 months and they should be filing bankruptcy.

Excellent example of Suicidal Marketing
     One of the first things you want to do when you have a perfectly good business but would like to commit financial suicide is to piss off  your customers.  There are many ways to do this but one of the sure-fire ways would be to shove LGBT or homosexual issues down your customers' collective throats.  Since the homos are only a small portion of the population, it only makes sense that the demographics in the Minnesota are are the same as the whole nation.  Which means that this company has the potential of completely pissing off over 90% of their customers.  This is masterful suicidal marketing.  If I wanted to screw up my own business, this would be a perfect way of doing it.

Another examples of Suicidal Marketing
     JC Penney's had done a wonderful job of screwing up the company.  And they did it with the homosexual spokes dyke Ellen Degeneres (French for degenerate) who joined the company in early 2012 with the stock price at around $42.00 per share.  Many people objected to her and the homo lifestyle depicted in their advertising.  As a result, the stock price as of this writing (06/14/16) at $8.05 per share.)  This kind of suicidal marketing don't get no better than dis.  If my math is correct that is an 80% decline in the stock price.  You can't have a better example and JC Penney's has done the best job of suicidal marketing so far.
     But then there is Target Stores.  They decided that transgender people could use the bathroom in whatever gender they consider themselves to be.  Now, notice that transgender populations are even smaller than the homos yet Target manages to piss off their customer base with this nonsense. The stock price when they announced this policy was around $81.00 per share.  It is now quoted at $66.74 per share.  That's a whopping 17% drop in the value of the stock in just under two months.  That's an estimated $10 billion loss of value to their stock shares.  I'm sure their major stock holders are thrilled with the management.

Politics and religion don't belong in the business environment
     People are always going to have different opinions on any issue, but I think it is foolish to attempt to push of political beliefs on the customers.  Granted, Urban Bean is just a small company, but the same principle is still in effect; pissing off the customer.  They may have great coffee but this little chain has a lot of competition.  I think it is stupid and dangerous for company management to delve into the political realm by chasing off customers by saying that they don't what Trump supporter's money.  In this case, Trump supporters are the back door into the homosexual movement and Islamophobia.  The natural economic law will take over as customers will take their business elsewhere.

Conclusion:
     If you are an idiot and you enjoy losing money and putting your workers out of a job, then the Suicidal Marketing is for you.  Remember, the most important thing to do is to anger your customers and put them in a frenzy so that they will go over to your competition.  Making money is so overrated and with the Suicidal Marketing scheme in place, you will be guaranteed to be a failure and screw up your worker's jobs.

Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land




Sunday, June 12, 2016

Communist Candidates

10/13/17 Update  I wrote this article during the last election and it is important as to what has NOT been done.  In order for any government not to have a communist-fascist agenda, there must be an eliminatiion of things such as the income tax, property tax, public schools, central banking, and inheritance tax.  Or, an easier way to say it is to eliminate all programs which seem to comply with the 10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto.  Don't hold your breath.
______________________________________________________________________________      
One of the stark realities of this election season is that both Trump and Clinton are both communist candidates who will probably do nothing to rid the government of communist principles.
There are some things that would have to change in order for a government to function properly.  However, neither candidate appears to want to do what it takes to adjust the government for the benefit of the American people.  In fact, the value of any government comes into question given the poor results of a communist society.  If people had a higher standard of morality, then there would be no need for the government as people would abide by the natural law and solve their own problems between themselves.  But that would mean that they would have to take more responsibility for themselves rather than having the government do it for them.  When a society is weak and dependent on the government, society as a whole suffers.  No good thing can come from large government and today's version of the government shows the abomination in full bloom.

Communism that should be removed
     The United States government and the candidates running for office should be taking a big look at the poor results of the current communist state.  However, the liberal candidates will never address the problems because they are in fact communist.  Having said that, so are the conservatives and I'll give an example of this.

Income tax
     The income tax is the 2nd plank of the Communist Manifesto.  Trump, who claims to be a conservative  has stated that he intends to lower the income tax.  The problem here is that the lowering of the tax rate does little to solve the problem.  What needs to happen is that the income tax should be abolished completely.  The income tax is a communist style tax and all of the libtards go along with it and so do the "conservatives."  The income tax is a slave tax and everyone who pays it is a slave.  If the tax were just one penny, it would still be evil.  The result of the income tax is that it creates the market for loans and usury which always destabilizes society economically.  All of the income tax money goes to pay the interest on the phony debt to the Federal Reserve Bank.

Property tax
     In order to truly own their property, the titles to the properties would have to be in the form of allodial titles and the property tax would have to be abolished.  If the property tax cannot be paid, the state could come in and take the property away.  This also destabilizes society and the people are not secure in their own homes.  Much of the property tax goes to fund the communist schools who not only teach socialism, but they are now teaching sexual perversions to the children.  If the property tax is taken away, then the schools will close and that would be a good thing.  Children belong at home with their parents and not in school being taught by communist libtards and "progressives."

Lowering income tax
     If Trump could get elected and lower the income tax, the economy would do better but it   wouldn't solve the problem.  Income tax is a curse upon the land and it is a communist idea and it should be abolished.  I call it the Communist Jew tax as this idea was first put into a writing called The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels who were Talmudic Jews.  This is important to know that there is a religious overtone that stems from Judaism which is offensive to God's natural law.  Everyone understands that slavery violates the natural law and income tax is slavery.  The natural law says that a man is entitled to the fruit of all of his labor.

Voting solves nothing
     Voting is the Lipstick on the Communist Pig.  It gives the people the idea that their vote can effect a positive change in the system when the facts show that the system is rigged.  Even Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump know that the system is rigged to keep the same dictators in place.  And that's what politicians are; dictators.  I suggest that they all get shipped to Cuba and let them stay there for awhile until they repent.  In the meantime, it's probably better to stay separated from all of it and learn to be more independent because at some point the system will fail tragically and it will destroy society as we know it.  Until mankind learns to abolish all of the principles of communism, the problems will remain to be a scourge on mankind.

Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land

Monday, June 6, 2016

Is Trump a Racist?

     I have to laugh at the MSM's reaction to the alleged racist remarks of Donald Trump about Federal Judge Curiel's Mexican heritage.  Trump's concern is whether or not he would be prejudiced regarding the Trump University.  Mr. Trump has plenty to be concerned about.  Judge Curiel is also a member of the racist hate group called La Raza (The Race) which has probably been a part of the protests at Trump's rallies.  If I were Trump, I'd be more worried about the La Raza connection.  None of the other mainstream Republicans seem to care about that, they are just focusing on Trump calling the judge a Mexican.  That's not a racist remark.  The man is of the Mexican race.  If he called him a "beaner" that might be interpreted as racist.  But now the MSM is rolling all over Trump.  If I were in Trump's shoes with this lawsuit, I'd have the same concerns about the judge being prejudiced.  Trump has a valid point.
     Neutered Newt Gingrich is criticizing Trump, but Neutered Newt was instrumental in passing NAFTA and helping to destroy the manufacturing and agricultural industries in the "United States."  Neutered Newt has done more to destroy life as we knew it here and he really has a lot of crust to criticize Trump for being concerned about a prejudicial judge.  The legal system does not like white rich guys so I think Trump's concern is well founded.
     Trump should just tell them all to go shove it where the monkey puts his finger.



Related:
Neutered Newt Gingrich


Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land