Wednesday, July 9, 2014

Relying Upon What Other People Say

   

If there was any time in my life when I have been in any serious trouble, it was because of my belief in what other people say or write.  As a man, I have to say that my mistake in life is not listening to my inner voice of conscience where the true commandments and the natural laws reside.  I believe that God created us with this latent knowledge of right and wrong; good and evil.  All men and women live under the same rules and under the natural law that God created.  So then the real God is the one who created us, and the rest of it is just a bunch of nonsense.  While there are other cultures and different races, the fact is that all people have to reside under the same basic conditions of the natural order.  Paying attention to the natural laws and using right reason and common sense will always be a benefit.  The true culprits to living a good natural life are evil people who establish evil governments and evil religions.  Since government and religion are the two most destructive components to a happy life, I want to spend some time on how they work, what they teach, and the danger of blindly accepting their doctrines without any question.


Doubting Thomases

Some people who question the veracity of a subject are many times called "doubting Thomas" because the question the truth about a teaching.  Questioning the truth of anything is always healthy.  If the Bible says that Jesus Christ is God in the flesh, then it would be a reasonable act to question the facts or the evidence that support this conclusion.  If this doctrine is blindly accepted, then the person praying to Jesus Christ as if he is God has the potential of falling into idolatry for believing in a lie.  This is why people are so easily fooled.  They listen to a preacher, and for whatever reason, accept what is being said as the truth without ever knowing for sure if it is true.  I believe in the God who created me because I am conscious of my own existence and I can see and marvel at the beauty of the creation.  In other words, I use the results of the creation as my evidence for God's existence.  I don't believe in any kind of evolution because I see no evidence in nature to support the idea of it.  I don't need a book to understand the workings of God; I can see it for myself.

There is no end to the evil that can be said or written down, so it is essential that people learn to think for themselves and to come up with their most rational conclusions.  Religions, in general, produce more trouble than they are worth, and they distort those things that God created to fulfill their own deviant agenda.  If I look at the results or the fruit of the various religions, I am never impressed with their results, behavior, nor their wisdom.  I am actually shocked at their hypocrisy.  And in today's world it is difficult not to be a hypocrite and that's one area of behavior upon which many people need to improve.

I was brought up as a Roman Catholic from the time I was a young boy, and I couldn't believe the nonsense I learned.  Upon reading the bible, I figured out that the Catholic church wasn't even Christian, in the biblical sense of the term.  As I moved on in life, I went through most of the Christian denominations only to find that they too, while calling themselves "Christians" were just as corrupted as the Roman Catholics.  I eventually withdrew from all churches because the bad fruit of them was clearly visible and their teachings were not true and they were doing damage to my life.  Once I withdrew, most of my problems disappeared.  That was a difficult lesson to learn, but now I check the facts and the evidence first before arriving at a conclusion.  In starting over, I believe in the God who created us and I believe in the use of the commandments and the natural law.  I have also found that many of the earlier Christian writings were more helpful in learning virtue and morality than what was in the bible.  Why would those books be removed from use?  Probably because the modern day Pharisees do not want to be teaching morals and virtue.  Oh sure, they give it lip-service as a cover, but the facts show that these books were removed when they should have been included.  These books contained the teaching that fornication is bad, but also the dynamics of it and how to avoid it.
(Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs)  It is one thing to say don't do it but is is also nice to know the reason why.  Homosexuality could never have taken hold if there were real godliness in today's society. It  would not be tolerated.  Both religion and government have failed to be a hedge against perversion but do more to accelerate it.

It is my opinion that God's existence doesn't depend upon any set of books.  It is also my opinion that learning virtue and wisdom doesn't not depend on any books but right reason and common sense.  However, I do put high value in the biblical writings of Proverbs and Psalms.  Those are the most practical and they should be mastered if that's possible.    And as long as they reflect the truth, I will continue to read them.

Thus, in the religious venue, what facts does anyone have that the bible is the word of God?  What facts do Muslims have the Koran is the word of God or Allah?  I would answer the bible question in that I don't have facts, but those statements that line up with the commandments and the natural law, I can then receive them as truth.  But to have a blind faith in any religious or political writing is, in my mind, extremely dangerous.  Any writing that displays the truth is going to be of value.  And that is up to the reader to determine what's true and what isn't.  I think it is always reasonable to have a healthy skepticism for any writing and belief until the truth of the subject matter can be determined.  To do otherwise may put a man in a weak position.

What facts do I have that God exists?  Here's my opinion.

  1. Fact: the universe exists and it is highly complex, but it is always coordinated so that one thing doesn't exist without the other.
  2. Fact: The beauty of the creation is always perfect from every angle.  Most everything in nature looks good and is there for the enjoyment of man and beast.
  3. Fact: I know right and wrong with that latent knowledge that God bestowed on me.  If I take the time to reason something out according to the natural law, I will always get good results. If I make the wrong choice, then I suffer for it.
  4. The conscience should always be followed because I believe God gave us all one to keep the discipline of the natural law.

These are just a few of the reasons I believe in God because within the proper context of the natural law; it is difficult to go wrong.  But if a man picks up a book and then blindly believes it to be the "word of God" I believe that there is where a lot of problems start.  The bible alone has so many different versions, that it is difficult to discern who said what.  Which writer is lying or telling the truth?  How is anyone going to sort all that out?  Yet, it is easier to simply test any writing with the standard of the natural law which confirm the commandments.  If it doesn't make any sense, then it is probably better just to set questionable teachings aside, rather than use them and then find out later they were wrong.

Pitting one group of people against another

In order to gain control of the people, the govtards, and the religious people fulminate "jihads" or "holy wars" against people for no other reason than to take control and make slaves out of them.  Going to war and then claiming God told us to do it is shameless bullshit.  These wars are recalled in the Bible and the Koran yet there is nothing in nature nor in the commandments that suggest anything about any virtue in going to war.  I don't recall God ever telling me to go to war with anyone.  The wisdom of the commandments tells me that a man or woman is much better of not joining any military.  And the reason should be that being a part of a military is going to provoke them into breaking one of the commandments.  Breaking the commandments always produces bad results.  No one should fall for this scam, yet many of our young people go to fight old men's satanic wars and then destroy their own lives as a result.  Almost all wars in modern history were intentionally started so that the powers that be could take control out of the chaos.  I wonder why young people keep joining the military.

Don't rely completely on any writing or other media in order to make informed judgments..

I am of the opinion that a belief in anything should be based completely upon any form of media.  Just because someone wrote something down, doesn't necessarily mean that the writing is true.  I try to approach a writing with a certain amount of skepticism because I know just how easy it is to twist the facts into the meaningless garbage.  I avoid most other media including television.  This medium is extremely destructive to the mind and everything seen on it should be highly questioned.  The power of evil is in the lie. Of course, the lie breaks God's commandments, so it really doesn't have much power within the context of the relationship between good and bad.  But the lie has the ability to turn our minds to things that are not true and it distorts our thinking.  And for this reason, when I read something, I always keep in mind that I may come across a bunch of lies.  When that happens, I just avoid the lies and attempt to ascertain the truth.  This keeps me out of a lot of trouble.

Related:
On Reading and Writing

Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land

Saturday, May 31, 2014

Homo Nuclear Weapons



The global new world order powers are attacking the traditional family in what I would liken to a societal nuclear weapon.  The homos are using their perversion as a battering ram against everything that is good and that is within good taste.  The slutty performance by Michael Sam during his NFL (not for long) draft used his kissing of his he-bitch to completely traumatize the people who like the NFL.  Then there is the article in Time magazine about the so-called new frontier on civil rights showing the picture of a transgender black man.  This was doubly offensive because the black people are especially offended by homosexuality.  This was intended to break the moral barrier of the black people as well as everyone else.  And then there's the story coming out of Pittsburg, Texas regarding Earl's Bait shop and restaurant who don't want to serve "fags."

Political purpose of homosexuals

Homosexuals have a definite anti-social agenda.  They want to break down the traditional values of the commandments and the natural law.  Because their activities are so perverted, most people don't like talking about it.  I didn't even know about homosexuals until I was about 14 years old and my first reaction was why would a man do that when there are so many nice women?  I was horrified at the thought.  But, I didn't understand that there is a political purpose to this and that the reason for it in my mind is very clear.

Spiritual battle

There is a spiritual battle going on and many of us fail to recognize it for what it is and how to prevent it from destroying our lives.  Nature tells us that homosexuality is completely unnatural and it is evil to engage in it.  Homosexuality will compromise a man's sexual equanimity and put thoughts into his mind that shouldn't be there.  The very idea of this activity is completely offensive to God as it offends his laws and commandments.  And that is the whole point of homosexuals; it is there to offend God at every turn.  What few homos don't understand is that if they sow to the wind, they will reap the whirlwind.  Payback is a bitch, and the worst of the payback will not come so much from other men, but it will come from God.

Satanic government

Since most governments and religions are satanic in their nature, it is easy to understand why these governments support the LGBT agenda.  LGBT is a satanic agenda and it fits in perfectly with the  government policies under the cover of "civil rights."  Every bad deed seems to like a legitimate or the color of righteousness when doing their evil deeds.  Adopting the "civil rights" aspect of homosexuals is a classic example of using the good to cover for the evil.  This is also laughable because they really aren't fooling too many people.  But they are fooling enough to make it look powerful.  People like me who stand up to this are called bigots and homophobes, when the fact is that homosexuality should have never been put in the forefront of today's society.   Just the thought of it is extremely evil.

Homosexuals tolerated in religions

I believe that most all of the religions that I've examined over the years are just satanic support cults to support the government god-state.  They hardly ever lift a finger to fight this moral cancer on society.  And the reason is because that they themselves are on the same evil side.  It's the only way I know of to explain it.

Homo Nuclear Weapons

Let's look at the tactics of the homosexuals again and think of each one of the tactics as a homo nuclear weapon that was created by evil people to destroy our civilization.
  • Promote the perversion
  • Attack the children by promoting this disgusting idea within the schools.  This is essential to the homos to brainwash and pervert the children's thinking on their own sexuality.
  • Create a sense of legitimacy by hiding the evil using it as a  "civil rights" issue. The civil rights is the shield for the evil.  Homosexuality is bad behavior under the color of "civil right" such as those that should have belonged to black people because of racism.
  • Attack opponents by calling them bigots and homophobes.
  • Attack masculinity and femininity by inverting the sexual experience
  • Invert morality to make the satanic look good and normal sexual behavior as evil.
All of these combine for the homo- nuclear arsenal.  These are the tools to totally corrupt society.  I don't think a nuclear weapon on a big city could do as much damage that what homos can do to a few generations of people.   Homosexuality is anti-social and the people who engage in it are extremely nasty people.  The ones I have met were not the kind of people I would want to be around.  I hated working with them because they were always promoting their perversion and trying to push it on me.

The ultimate political weapon

A weak society is much easier to control and this is why homosexuality is promoted as an alternative life-style.  A moral society would be almost impossible for the evil people to control because there would encounter moral resistance to any of their evil policies; i.e. usury.  What does usury have to do with homosexuality?  Both are very evil and both have attempted to worm their way into everyones lives.  The type of perversion isn't as important as long as it is evil, it will work to destroy mankind.
However, the homosexuals know that their perversion is the most destructive.  The LGBT garbage that is taught will encourage some people to cross the line of the natural law, making it so much easier for the elites to weaken and thus take control.

Homos destroy themselves

The upside of this is that the homos are in the process of destroying themselves as they are such incredibly nasty people.  They are foul-tempered because they know they are doing wrong and they cannot tame their own conscience.  There is always going to be a heavy price to pay for their moral free-for-all.  And this is why they are so unhappy and will do anything to justify their poor sexual choices.  They think by making this a civil rights issue, then their conscience will be soothed but the natural law, which everyone is subject to, will not allow it.  Their consciences will be tormented until the day they die.

Conclusion

I might suggest to homosexuals to reconsider their position and turn away from what they are doing.  There is no profit in it and it seems to me to be a big waste of time and a waste of life.  The act of homosexuality is so hideous, that it shouldn't be that hard to set it aside, and then look for a normal relationship, such as one with the opposite sex within the context of marriage.  Remember,
a homosexual has nothing because they are essentially losers by living their lives on the dark side.  Putting one's life within the commandments and the natural law is far more profitable and will produce true happiness.

The new world order psychos are using homos as a nuclear weapon upon modern civilization.

Related:
The Downside of Homosexuality
Pandering to Homosexuals

Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land

Sunday, May 25, 2014

Swear Not at All


  One of the key components of the new world disorder is oath taking.  I have written a few articles on the dangers of the oath, and I will include them at the bottom of this article.  I am at the point in my life to where I'm feeling my mortality.  The only place I feel safe anymore is within the context of God's commandments that conform to the natural law.  And as a result, I sometimes wind up in a situation that I never would have predicted and I was forced to make a definite choice between doing the right thing and choosing the evil.

Legal System

     The legal system is based upon oath taking and it is as convoluted as anyone can imagine.  Going to court is like being thrown into an intellectual hell; just without the flames.  Asking for the truth or the facts is like being in hell and asking Satan for a glass of water.  There is really no rhyme or reason to it to anyone who wishes to use right reason.  In fact, it is my belief that when a man or woman goes into court and swears an oath, he is cursing himself and at some point in his life he'll get the payback from God.  I for one really don't like the payback.

Summoned to a Deposition

     In late January, I was "summoned" (like a dead spirit) to a deposition that involved Joe Banister and me back around 2004.  I was put into prison for telling the truth about the income tax.  I don't want to get into the whole story on this case, but I was apparently required to present myself.

Perjury
     Perjury is not only lying but lying under oath.  Since telling the truth is always my goal, there's no reason for me to have sworn an oath as it is offensive to my spiritual beliefs.  Therefore, I took the position that I was willing to testify but I wasn't willing to swear an oath.  Remember, anyone who swears an oath, testifies and makes a mistake, he would have to prove that his testimony is a mistake and not a lie.  That would be very difficult to prove.  No one in their right mind would swear an oath under those conditions.  Yet many people do it over and over again never knowing how much danger they are incurring.

Audio of Deposition

Here is a link to the audio on this deposition.  There are some dead spots on the audio as I was waiting for the attorneys to show up.  Please take the time to wait as the audio gets very interesting.

You will hear that the US Attorney tries numerous times to get me to swear an oath and then tries to get me to accept the word perjury as just lying.  You can hear me correcting him or letting him know that I know the difference between perjury and lying.  Again, perjury is lying under oath.  You will also notice how the attorney threatens me with jail time if I don't swear an oath.  I could make the case that he was attempting to use extortion to compel me to swear an oath by threatening me with jail.
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/ThompsonDeposition02-11-14edited.mp3

The Ultimate Evil

This is oath taking nonsense is the satanic way of evil men attempting to be gods.  Only God himself has the power to swear oaths.  My recommendation is to never, ever, sign anything "under the penalties of perjury" or swear any oaths.  It will save you a lot of trouble.

Conclusion

It has been about three months since this interview took place and almost anything can happen. I haven't heard from any "court" yet.  No one on earth should be forced or threatened to swear oaths or else. All I know that whatever comes my way is not going to be as bad as God's wrath if I had sworn the oath.  It is my opinion that it is the oath that is the center of all of the evil upon the earth.  Government people have little respect for themselves let alone other people and this is a typical example of the attempt to use force and violence on me to get their own way.  The legal systems in most nations are hopelessly corrupted.


Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land

Related Articles:
Stop Swearing Oaths
Swear an Oath: Tell a Lie
All Bad Things Flow from the Oath of a Man

Thursday, May 22, 2014

Suicidal Marketing: NFL Not for Long

Update: 09/14/17

I wrote this article over three years ago.  I was talking with a friend tonight and he was telling me he was an avid football fan but in recent years, he has lost interest.  We were talking about the NFL's ratings and the general lack of interest a lot of men have for the game now.  For me, it was the Michael Sam incident and the fact that all of the networks were pushing for the "normalization" of homosexuality in a man's game.  I watch football sometimes, but I have lost most of my interest in the game because of the mixing of political correctness.  The market for football may be declining because there are also so many other options for people to spend their entertainment time.  It will still take a long time for the game to be completely destroyed by the corporate communist psychos, but I have all the confidence in the world that they will destroy their own market.  That's why I call it "Suicidal Marketing."

_____________________________________________________________________

     One of the funniest remarks I heard from the then coach of the Atlanta Falcons Jerry Glanville who was criticizing a bad call made by a rookie official.  Glanville said, ""This is N-F-L, which stands for 'not for long' when you make them f**kin' calls."   Given the recent fiascos involving the NFL, I'm thinking that the NFL itself will be "not for long."  

Pushing homosexuality on the fan (customer base)

   It is my opinion that Michael Sam will do for the NFL what Ellen Degeneres did for JC Penney's.  The NFL has managed to piss off most of their customers, because a lot of us guys enjoyed the faggot-free environment of the football game.  But now, after seeing Michael Sam smooching his he-bitch, I can see no reason for me to watch the NFL ever again.  The shocking image of a man kissing another man just doesn't work for me and I doubt that I'll ever watch another football game again.
     This appeared to be a staged event intended to promote the homos and twist the minds of the young people who enjoy the game.  This was a broadside against traditional moral values in any culture or society.
     Frankly, this really pissed me off and I'll never look at the NFL in the same way again.  This completely ruined my enjoyment of the game.  I don't mind saying it, because it is true and it will be interesting to see how the attendance figures start going down as this organization intentionally pissed off almost all of their customer base.  In fact, I don't see how any man could possibly watch or play football for an organization like this.  

Throwing the baby out with the bathwater

     In this case, I think it would be prudent because an evil line was crossed.  To promote homosexuality in such a manner means that the whole NFL organization is more of a satanic cult that promotes perversion.

Suicidal marketing

     Kamakaze or suicidal  marketing is getting to be one of the most popular sales models of the "new age."  And it goes something like this:

  • Piss off or anger the majority of your market.  I'm sure the NFL has intentionally done just that with the Michael Sam incident
  • Give the perverts center stage...  Just as Ellen Degeneres ran JC Penney to the ground with the lesbian-centered marketing program Penny's stock went from 41.505 December 31, 2012 to 8.88 as of today.  This company was one the decline even before Ellen (BE) but hiring her as their spokesperson seems to be the thing that may be the complete undoing of a successful company.  Now, it looks like the NFL is going to follow the JC Penney model. And with Michael Sam being the first openly "gay" player, it now becomes a "historic" moment, but the reality is that this is going to become a marketing nightmare.  I certainly don't want to see a bunch of queers play football.
  • Attack your own cash flow...  This is a no-brainer.  By pissing off one's customers, people stop making purchases at your business.  In this case, it looks like JC Penney's doesn't want straight people to buy in their stores.  The problem is that the perverts don't have much in the way of numbers to make up for it.  With plenty of other choices, JC Penney's may be a thing of the past.
  • Shoot your own race horses..  Given the recent lawsuits pointed at the NFL regarding dispensing of drugs and painkillers, it looks like the NFL has yet another soft spot.  Giving players too many drugs just so they can play is the perfect way to destroy a man's health.  I haven't given it much thought, but it does seem to me that maybe I shouldn't watch men destroying themselves and be "entertained" by it.
  • Denigrate your brand..  This is critical in destroying a perfectly good organization.  By promoting open homosexuality in their programs, the NFL has sullied their brand.  The same thing has happened to the Boy Scouts of America.  
Perfect execution

     The NFL seems to be starting a perfectly run suicidal marketing program.  Since the league is so popular, it may take a few years before it shuts down.  Time will tell if I'm correct, but it looks to me that the NFL is on the crest of a very steep decline.  Thus, the NFL will be "not for long" if it keeps up this nonsense.

Related:
Suicidal Marketing 1.0: JC Penney

Walter Allen Thompson is the author of Natural Law:Supreme Law of the Land

God's World Order; New World Order: Part 2 Looking at Results


God's Moral Order

I find it appalling that the moral level of life, in general, is at such a low level.  However, when I do encounter someone with a high moral standard, I look at the results, and it always looks much better.  The reason is that high moral standards fit in perfectly with the natural law, and in my opinion, one doesn't need to read anything in order to conform to it.  I believe we all have a latent knowledge of right and wrong, and it is our conscience that provides the discipline in order to keep us within our natural limits.  If the conscience is ignored, then we make more mistakes because we ignore the reality that is there for everyone.   But having a high moral standard a man can bypass the problems of the conscience because he has done nothing to set the conscience in motion.  I think that this is the key to recovering from the influences of the spiritual rot that comes from modern society.  The conscience is never provoked when we obey the commandments and the natural laws that God put forth as our guide to a peaceful life.  Once those boundaries are crossed, then we invite the pain of the conscience to torment us with the horror of our poor decisions.  Many people try to suppress the conscience by drinking too much or taking mind-altering drugs.  But the problem never goes away, and in fact, makes everything even worse.  Transgressing the natural law means nothing but more trouble for everyone concerned.  And it is all self-evident if we know what to look for and how to make proper judgments.  Judgments should be based upon facts, and those facts should always be in line with the natural law.  Any group of people who violate the natural laws does so at their own risk and they make everyone else's lives miserable.

Peace depends upon a high moral standard

I don't think very many men would join the military if they thought that they would become murderers.  However, that's exactly what happens if a man kills another man based on the order of some government or religious official.  Governments and religions that are run by immoral people are the cause of most of the wars.  An immoral man doesn't have the moral or intellectual capacity to make life and death decisions that can promote peace because he himself is immoral.  In fact, he may think of himself as a god.  The question a soldier should be asking himself is this: Am I just as guilty pulling the trigger or dropping bombs on innocent people as the man who gave me the order to do it?  Obviously, the man who pulls the trigger is just as guilty as the man who gave the order.  Governments retain just enough moral standards to look good on the surface, but when it comes to their own interests, they have no problem in killing anyone who gets in their way.  I believe this to be true of all governments and religions.  In those rare instances where someone has to defend themselves, there is no transgression.  But to put on a uniform and then go kill a bunch of people based on some psycho's order is completely immoral and outside of the natural order.  Thus, if people with high moral standards refused to join the military, then the military would have to be used for defensive purposes only and not to gain an advantage over other groups of people.  Low moral standards get innocent people killed or they have their lives ruined.

Results

The results are obviously self-evident.  We are now experiencing an almost complete breakdown of the moral social order, and in its place, we are seeing the disgusting "new world order."  All we have to do is to look at the results; the bad fruit.  Thus, the government and religious groups are run by people who follow Satan or satanic-demonic forces.  However, rather than get too wrapped up in who did what, when and where, I think it is much better for a man to button down the hatches and to get his own life in order.  If more men became moral beings such as God intended, then perhaps there will be some reason for hope.  But to turn the corner to restore morality, it has to start with every man and woman who chooses to abide in the commandments supported by the natural law.

Satanists are losers

Understand, that even the richest satanist in the world is still a big loser.  His money, fame, and fortune are momentary, but the end result of his life is doom and failure.  His lack of moral standards will speak for themselves, and he might not realize it until it is too late.  However, the moral man is way ahead of the satanic loser.  That should be obvious to everyone, but with the use of lying and mind control, there is a demonic attempt to reverse the natural order.  And if it continues, it will kill us all.  It makes more sense to take hold of God's world order, make it your own, and learn to live within its confines.  I won't suggest any religions as I think that they are as corrupted as the governments.  Since we all have a latent knowledge of the existence of God, we should use our own right reason and common sense according to what is seemly within the natural law.

There is nothing to be gained by associating with losers, especially satanic losers.  There is no reason to get involved in any of their activities as they greatly offend the God who created us.  Everything associated with them is all for nothing, as any pleasure will always result in dire pain and suffering in the future.  It is best to just leave them alone and don't do those things which offend God.

Focusing on the results in keeping the commandments and the natural law

If a man or a woman has an urge for fornication but manages to overcome the urge and to hold their fire, then there are some obvious benefits.  One big benefit is he won't be subject to any sexually transmitted diseases.  That's a big plus.  Another benefit is that it won't offend God as the person had enough self-control to overcome the promise of a short-term pleasure with a long term pain.  The relationship can be developed without the distraction of sex outside of the marriage.  There will be no out of wedlock pregnancies and no reason for an abortion.  See, all of the proper things of life fall into order when the commandments are followed.  It is always the good results that will make a man's life much better so it only makes good common sense to stay within the boundaries of the commandments and the natural law.

Walter Allen Thompson is the author of The Grace of Repentance: Keeping God's Commandments


Sunday, January 26, 2014

God's World Order; New World Order Part 1


     I have spent countless hours studying and observing the idea of the "new world order" which is completely opposed to the "God's world order."  God's world order is that of the natural laws and the commandments that are in harmony with the natural law.  Mankind cannot change nature because changing the natural order is only within God's power.  In understanding the new world order, is to understand that it is designed to destroy all of the goodness that a man can take from is own life.  If there is any love or joy in a society's life, there will always be those influences that will try to tempt us into evil.  The new world order exists to screw everything up and leave people dysfunctional from a spiritual and physical state.  Learning how to stay in God's world order and gaining the upper hand over evil is the solution for living a successful life.  The natural law is there for all to see.  It doesn't require public notice; it doesn't require being written down, but it does require a mind that is willing to draw its own conclusions and to properly interpret what is put in front of them.  I want to spend more time with this subject of natural law on this blog.

God or Satan?

God's .world order is one where mankind lives properly within the boundaries of the natural law.  He doesn't worship false gods (why even bother?), swear oaths (taking the Lord's name in vain), respects his mother and father, doesn't murder, commit adultery, lie, make graven images, charge interest or usury, or steal and cheat.  He tries his best to stay out of the new world order and manages his life by acquiring virtues instead of bad habits.  The Satanist will do just the opposite.  And the purpose of satanism is to destroy mankind.  Think of the new world order as the war machine that is being used against God's people who were created by him.  To go against God's world order is to get very poor results.  And once the decision has been made to go against the natural law, then there will always be bad results.  And in this case, the bad results are the pointers to the truth.

Looking at the results

Whenever I have violated the commandments or the natural law, I have always been on the receiving end of bad results.  However, this is the same for everyone.  Once the bad choice has been made, there will always be a string of bad results that will follow.  Bad choices always produce something bad and usually there is very little time between the offense and the inherent payback.  For example: if a man commits adultery, the bad results with be: a shattered marital relationship, lost of trust, heartbroken children, possibly murder, assaults, family court,  a myriad of other horrible consequences because he wanted to have sex with someone other than his own wife.  These bad results make the man unhappy.  Every other offense against the natural law will be a bit different, but all of these offenses produce the bad results which in turn produce the misery of life.

Government

In our time in history, the governments of the world, combined with religion, contribute to most of the destruction to society.  The government is anti-social and it only serves the greed of those who wield the power.  Government starts all of the wars making life nearly impossible for those who which to simply live in peace with their families.  Obviously, government, which is the crown-turd of the new world order, is not only unnecessary but it is the major contributor to everything that is offensive.  Remember, the new world order is satanic and government, being new world order does its business under the rules of satan.  And those rules are designed to destroy mankind.  The governments of the world operate under various forms of war powers.  Government as we know it is a bad idea because the foundation of it is evil.  And again, looking at the results of these governments is all we need to know in order to see the damage being done to society.  Government is simply a gang of thugs who wish to do violence to anyone who disagrees or opposes them.  It doesn't matter what country or leader because in substance they all rely on one thing: violence.

Religion

Religion is equal if not more destructive than governments because it seems to take away a man's moral compass under the banner of "God's teachings."  Having been a "Christian" for most of my life, that word can mean almost anything including pagan.  By examining all of the religious doctrines, I cannot be confident in any of them.  I do lean toward Christianity, but I simply do not trust the source of the teachings.  While many of the biblical teachings may be good, many are not and these written teachings go as far as undermining God's natural order.  Therefore, I think it is much better to get one's moral standards from the natural laws and the commandments that agree with them.  This way, there is very little margin for error; if any.   If a law is a natural occurrence and the concept of it can be determined by using right reason and common sense, then I think a man or a woman will always get good results.  This is how you take away the pain of bad government and bad religion.  While we may physically and mentally be enslaved by government and religion, we can be at the very least mentally free from the idiocy of the satanic new world order.  To be mentally free is to be taking the first step for life the way I believe God intended.

Using right reason and common sense

The two most important tool is going to be right reason and common sense, in order to properly understand a man's place under the natural law.  It is obvious that a man cannot live but for more than a few minutes without air to breathe.  This is just one truth of many that abides in the natural law.  So in using right reason, it only makes sense that one doesn't choke someone in order to make them die.  Instead, a man's rights under the natural law mean that he has a "right" not to be choked to death.  The man has a right not to have the fruit of his labor stolen by anyone, even it is by something called "government."  Right reason and common sense do not need to be written down.  The veracity   of anything in writing should always be confirmed by right reason and common sense in harmony with the natural law.

Let's put religion to the test of right reason.  Under natural law, it appears to me that there could only be one God and that his natural laws must be obeyed if we want to live in mental and spiritual health.  The bad payback that comes from violating the natural is swift and it makes life miserable.  However, if a man puts in his ideas of what he believes that God is or that there are multiple instances or variations of God, then we begin to see the problem with religion.  If there are so many religions, then how can any of them be right? Which one would be right?  If there was one who taught the complete natural law, then you might have a valid religion if none of their doctrines contradict each other.  But it has been my experience that all religions at some point will conflict with the natural order and contradict the commandments on various points.  These religions (all of the ones I am aware of) fall short in helping their believers to stay within the natural order which would be God's commandments which are in harmony with this natural order.  How do you know their god is the one true god?  My suggestion is that none of them represent completely God the creator of the heavens and the earth.  The problem is that lies are then entwined with the truth making the picture or understanding of God more incomprehensible.  This may be a big reason that religion is a failure in regards to providing mankind with a solid moral and principled foundation.

But, if one throws out all of the books and then observe the natural occurrences, I think he will be farther ahead in the understanding.  This is how I do it.  If God is my creator, then it doesn't make any sense to worship anyone or anything else; in fact, it would be downright stupid. This saves me from the curse of idolatry. Now, if I get the urge to turn to religion in order to express my worship, I have to make sure that the religion is true to God's commandments which are evidenced in the natural law.  It usually only takes just a few minutes of reading to figure out that what these religions are teaching are doctrines of the demented and insane and not the doctrines of the creator of everything we can see and not see. But these doctrines have enough truth in them to appear plausible.  My experience with written material is that it is very difficult to verify the information.  The only way I can tell if a writing is true is to crosscheck it with the facts that are available to me.  If I can't verify the truthfulness of  a writing, I simply set it aside until I get the understanding.  I've had many instances where I simply set aside what I was reading or even writing until I got the full understanding.  This way, by being patient, I can learn more difficult things with a better understanding.

Natural law trumps all others

There can never be any law more powerful and true than the natural law because it was established by the creator and no argument can be made against it.  Now, there may be some points we don't completely understand, but it is worth the effort to work with natural law as it is a great foundation and it works perfectly.  Why use something else?  We can see the poor consequences and I'm going to write more articles on this subject.

Related:
God's World Order; New World Order Part 2


Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land



Saturday, December 28, 2013

Duck Dynasty Update



A & E forgoes the Kool Aid

      When it comes to pandering to homosexual activist groups, the entertainment industry is one of the worst. However, faced with the complete collapse of a 14 million viewer along with all the ad revenue generated, A & E thought the better of it and decided not to destroy themselves. This is a perfect example of how the market can take care of some controversies. In this case: money talks, bull shit walks. And there was plenty of bull shit coming out of A & E and the various activist groups. The most telling for me was the comment that came from GLAAD.

GLAAD responds:

GLAAD responds: “Phil Robertson should look African American and gay people in the eyes and hear about the hurtful impact of praising Jim Crow laws and comparing gay people to terrorists. If dialogue with Phil is not part of next steps then A+E has chosen profits over African American and gay people – especially its employees and viewers.”

      Many gay people are sexual terrorists. They specifically target children in the public schools system, and their perverted practice helps to instigate sexual child abuse. And if anyone stands up against them, they become excoriated as being “homophobes.” Homophobia is a good thing; not a bad thing . It will save a man and woman a lot of trouble, heartache, disease, and it promotes common sense when it comes to proper reasoning regarding the issue of sex and its proper place. Homosexual activity is a perversion, forbidden by most major religions, but it is contrary to the natural law. Same gender sexual activity is a perversion of nature and it is self-evident. There's no argument. However, in order to pervert society, this anti-social behavior attempts to justify itself. They attempt to twist the weak and feeble-minded people into accepting that which is completely unnatural.
      In addition, being “gay” is not the same as racial discrimination such as what happened to the black or “colored” people. Racial discrimination is a valid complaint, especially since nature dictates one's race and color and there's nothing anyone can do about it. To judge a man one way or another because of race is extremely stupid and idiotic. Whereas, a man judges another by that person's behavior. This is legitimate judgment because a man is what he does. Homosexual activity can never rise to the level of any moral value because it is completely evil. GLAAD clearly hides behind the “African-Americans” using them as a mask for their perverted agenda. And it has been my experience with the black I've known throughout the years is that many blacks are very “homophobic.” Race is a bogus issue in this case. The reason being that homos are sexual perverts which has absolutely nothing to do with racial discrimination; they are two separate things.

Supporting people who are right
      This incident was interesting in that many people complained to A & E about their decision to suspend Phil. His family also backed him up and this is very important. When trouble comes to a member of a family, it is up to the members of that family to back up the member under attack. They didn't cut and run like a bunch of gutless wimps.
      Hopefully, this incident will be over for Robertson, but I doubt it. These homo-Nazis are vindictive and relentless in their pursuit of evil. It is their goal to take away any of the pleasures of life and put in its place stupid and evil things. The intent of the homosexual “movement” is to destroy society as we once knew it, and replace it with a bunch of pussy-men and bitchy women. Neither one is useful to the other.
     But if people who want better things in their lives will have to stick together to protect themselves from the filth of the homos. In this case, just the thought of losing 14 million viewers for a TV network was just too much to bear at this time.  The market rightfully did a perfect job in mitigating this incident.

Related:

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Duck Dynasty: This Quacks Me Up


Reality of homo behavior

    Recently, Phil Robertson, one of the cast of the extremely popular TV show Duck Dynasty, did an interview with Gentleman's Quarterly, and he gave his opinion on homosexuals.  While his description was a bit gross in its presentation, he was right on.  The idea of a man sticking his gadget in another man's butt is so offensive that it defies the imagination.  I've been known to make similar statements about homos and when you get that graphic, the disgust of the act becomes very apparent.  While the remarks are truly disgusting, they reflect the acts of homosexual men which is completely repugnant to the natural law.

Homosexuals a civil right issue?
     The network A & E suspended Robertson from the show in an effort to punish him for expressing his opinion.  His opinion was spot on, and most of the people in the country agree with him.  The other members of the cast have stood behind him, and now A & E is in a real fix.  With approximately 14 million viewers, it is obvious that if they tamper with a successful formula, they can go down to 14 viewers in very little time.  As of this date, the reports are showing that public support is on the side of Robertson, and the homo community (if you want to call it that) has lost a lot of credibility; and that's as it should be.
     This may be another case of suicidal marketing on the part of A & E.  Suspending one of the main stars of the cast will only hurt the show, but just like any other business, A & E is supposed to be making a profit for its owners and stockholders.  To take a show with that many viewers and then tamper with it just because a cast member gave an interview to a magazine, regardless of the content, is simply ludicrous.  Why jeopardize a market position when you don't have to?  A & E is making no friends with this move and the homo groups are just too small to make up for the demographics.  And if A & E supports the "LGBT" community, then they are just as much a part of the problem.  In my years of sales and marketing, I've never been able to sell products to a pissed-off customer.  And by suspending Robertson, A & E has angered 14 million customer who actually have money to spend.



Is criticizing homosexuals discrimination?
     The short answer is no.  Homosexual activities are things that are chosen; whereas, a person's race is something that they can't do anything about.  Whatever race a person has is not something that they choose.  Homosexual activity is something that a person chooses and it does not occur under Ithe natural law.  Homosexual activity destroys the person who engages in it and it ruins the good relationships they should be having with other people.  Whether homos know it or not, they are not well-liked by anyone because most people have a latent knowledge under the natural law that this behavior is just wrong.  Homos in general are rude, obnoxious, immature, and generally a scourge to society.  I don't even want to touch the office equipment they touch.  I don't want to be in the same office with them or any other kind of work environment as they are pushy and they promote their perversion.
     What is encouraging about this Duck Dynasty incident is that most people agree with Robertson's freedom to speak-out on this subject and bring in some common sense to this issue.  The homos are the ones who are destroying themselves, and they know it.  They know they will have no children.  They know they will most likely die an early death because of STDs.  And they know that the vast majority of people do not appreciate their disgusting life-style.  So, people who wish to separate from people with this kind of behavior are not discriminating, but they are exercising their options regarding with whom they associate.  I do not like to be in the same room with any homo at any level if I can help it.  I frankly, don't like anything about them.


Suicidal marketing........
If this situation wasn't so twisted, it would almost be comical; a real quack up.  But this is the corporate mentality: Shoot your own racehorses. There's no good deed that goes unpunished and no stupid move that isn't tried at least once. Usually, if it fails, do it again. I don't think A & E is going to recover from the loss of this situation.  I suggest that the executives at this network learn the difference between the meaning of a behavior and race.  Homosexuality is not a civil rights issue; it is a behavior issue just as Robertson so graphically pointed out.

Watch the marketplace do it's job
     The bright side of this is watching the marketplace do its job very efficiently.  When anyone puts forth a product or service that someone wants, then that's were there is going to be economic success, regardless of what the dumb corporate executives say.  Good products and good service sells. If Duck Dynasty is a good product, then someone other than A & E might like to have the $400,000,000 that the show generates. The idiocy of A & E is breath-taking in its scope.
     When I was in sales, I always remember that my competitor's stupidity was always my best selling point, and in this case A & E is quite the sales asset for their competitors.  This quacks me up.  Some things never seem to change.  All I had to do is to keep my own stuff in order and be responsive to my customers.  You think A & E would do that?  No.  They just shoot their own race horses and then pander to the LGBT psychos when they (LGBT) can't provide any market share.  But the reason is obvious. LGBT is a psychotic-Nazi political tool that is intended to destroy mankind, and A & E is helping that goal by their whimpering and pandering to them.

Rage of the Homo-Nazis
The homosexual issue is a Nazi style political tool intended to destroy society. Marriage between a man and a woman is an essential building block for any successful society. The homo-Nazis continue to engage in religious persecution and they cannot stand to be criticized for their deviant behavior. And this is why I think A & E is pandering to these groups. They aren't men and women enough to stand up against the persecution the homo-Nazis dish out. The end result of this kind of pandering to these groups is a major reason people are getting sick of their programming. To suspend Robertson who is a proven success is a completely crack-brain idea. Who really cares if his remarks offended the homos? I'll betcha most of those 14 million viewers agree with Robertson's analysis. The backlash coming against A & E is encouraging and refreshing; for a change. Hit them where it hurts; in the pocketbook.


Why All Porn is Gay: This article is gross but it shows the depravity of sex outside of marriage and that there is a very specific agenda from the homo-Nazis to destroy the fabric and foundation of the family.


Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land
    

Saturday, December 21, 2013

Income Tax versus the Natural Law


      One of the evilest taxes imposed upon mankind is the income tax. Most people don't realize it, but the income tax is the second plank of the Communist Manifesto which states: “A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.” At rates approaching 50% of a man or woman's gross earnings, I don't doubt that at these rates, we are seeing a heavy progressive and graduated income tax. So if a man works and earns $100,000, he will take home only $50,000.00 Now, as a former “tax protester” I know that these internal revenue laws are a thing of the past and that they don't impose any income tax on any man, woman, or child. I know this because their stupid codes say so. But before I get to that, let's find out how any communist gets the power or authority to impose any tax.

Authority to tax...
      The unfortunate reality is that the authority to tax comes from the barrel of a gun under man-made laws; it is established on violence. That authority becomes theft. Because under natural law, a man is entitled to the fruit of all of his labor. The fruit of the labor is the man, woman, or child who worked for it and not some intellectual retard from the government who lays claim to all or a portion of it. To have an income tax is to have a slave tax. The natural law comes from the God who created the heavens and the earth, and it properly reflects the proper morality by not offending its own laws. There can never be a lawful income tax; ever because it would violate the laws God put forth.

      The same thing is true for slavery. Slavery or involuntary servitude is forbidden by the natural laws. Of course, it is also forbidden in the scriptures and it is, in general, extremely vile and foul to the most basic sensibilities of most men. Thus, when a man has an income tax placed upon his head, he has become a slave. If anyone other than himself has the right to take what he earned, then truly, this man is a slave. Here, in the “United States”, our so-called freedoms are delusional if we are, in fact, slaves. Some may say: “Well, they don't take all of my money....” My answer to that would be another question: At what percentage of the income tax is it not slavery? That's the same question as: How does one become partially pregnant? The fact is that the income tax is a communist slave tax and it is repugnant to the natural laws that the creator put forth.

A voluntary tax....?
      And the “government” has the audacity to tell people that the tax is voluntary. Just recently, the commies in these committee hearings regarding the IRS scandals publicly announced that the income tax is completely voluntary. Yeah right! Again, they lie right to the public's collective faces. Try not volunteering like I did, and you'll get a free federally-funded vacation in a gated community. But why do we get conflicting signals from the government? But why would the IRS say it is voluntary? This used to puzzle many of us and we actually spent a lot of time studying the internal revenue laws. The problem is that the whole religious and governmental processes are just frauds and scams. The income tax is a cruel hoax and a scam of biblical proportions. My thinking that the IRS says that it is voluntary is if the tax is being applied to men and women. Anything else would violate natural law and no government has the right to violate that for any reason. God sets the rules of life and not the government. All governments would have to conform to the natural law in order to have any credible authority. Religions from my view of them put forth more delusions to help confuse mankind from his marvelous existence within the natural law. You know the famous line: “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, render unto God what is God?” Next question for practical purposes should be: What authority does Caesar have over God? The obvious answer to that one is: nothing. Just because Caesar establishes a tax, doesn't mean it is lawful.  And when you look at their writings in the code, you'll find that none of the codes apply to men or women; they only apply to legal entities, humans (not men or women), or animals and livestock. A legal fiction has no rights as he was created by another man. To the “government”, a man or woman is a beast, thus the word human. The income tax applies to humans who are considered beasts. My theory is that the ideas of evolution were specifically intended to make men and women think they are on the same level as animals. This way, the government can ween them off of the natural law and replace it with man-made communist nonsense.

      Natural law does not allow for theft nor slavery, and the income tax is both of those things. Remember, the fruit of a man's work belongs to only him; anything else is slavery. Natural law is what all of us were born into and no one violates it to their benefit. Whosoever imposes an income tax on any man, woman, or child is a thief. That's all you need to know. And the heads of the “governments” and religions who go along with it are communists, thieves, and slave masters. I don't care who someone thinks he is: the President of the United States or a janitor, it's all the same for everyone. The natural law is there for use to use for the enjoyment of our lives. Man-made laws are how we end up limiting ourselves into the whole host of demented ideas: communism, socialism, democracy, republics, war, religion, social chaos, rather than looking at the natural facts of our existence and operating within those obvious limitations. Under the natural law, the income tax is a scam because it steals the labor of mankind, and in the case of the United States, it is a forced system of the payment of usury which in and of itself is theft.

No argument with the natural law...
      When a man correctly uses natural law as the foundation for his life and actions, it is built upon a solid foundation that does not have any argument in opposition to it. The end result will be the good fruit. The reason for this is that the truth resides in the natural, and it is impossible to argue in favor of breaking the natural law. The fallacies and the idiocies of the trespass will always be self-evident.
Income tax is as ridiculous as having the Congress pass a law against gravity. Does anyone think that nature would comply? Governments as we know them today are quite useless and they are anti-social. The only time anyone can take any authority over anyone else is in the violation of the natural law. So then, our current social morals are backasswards when compared to the natural laws. Evil can never become good, and good is never evil. In other words, there really is no argument. And for me, as one who enjoys a good argument; this saves me a bunch of time. I simply reduce the argument or discussion down to the terms of the natural law. That's good enough for me as the rest of the arguments outside of natural law are inconsequential and just an exchange of opinions. Natural law is a fact of life; it is what it is and no amount of chatter is going to change it. Obviously, a person's understanding of the natural law will vary from one person to another, but the fact remains, that the natural law will always be what it is regardless of what anyone says about it.

Natural law removes the need or even the desire for government and religion....
      In noticing the existence of governments throughout history, we find that these organizations are primarily responsible for all of the wars. Point the finger at any government, do the homework, and you'll see that it is always either a government, religion, or both who instigate wars and confusion among otherwise peaceful people. Do they fulminate fury and hatred throughout the world and for what purpose? These things are intended to destroy the lives of men, women, and children. There is no higher or noble cause, it is just done to inflict misery upon mankind. The instigators then take control over other people's lives and then strip them of their productive labor via the income tax and other financial persecutions. Adherence to the natural law would get rid of income tax and even the stupid idea of it. The government just isn't necessary under the natural law, but people would have to learn to think for themselves and be responsible for their own actions.


Paying their fair share.......
      Paying their fair share under natural law is absolutely nothing. Under natural law, a man who works will keep all of his pay. If he wants to donate to this or that project, then he should do so by his own free will. But some will say: “Who will build the roads?” Someone will build them. And besides, we have enough roads. Under a voluntary system the roads would probably be completed on budget and ahead of schedule. But the funding of such projects should be voluntary. The idea that it is acceptable for “governments” to steal from one group of people and then spend the money on the wishes of another group is absurd and it is ridiculous.

Income tax violates natural law.....
      Thus, it logically follows that a tax on the fruit of a man's labor is completely repugnant to the natural law as it establishes an organized system of theft and slavery. There can never be any benefit to any “nation” who imposes the income tax on anyone. Remember, nothing good comes out of evil. And most of the nations who impose the income tax on their populations, do so that to the detriment of the population at large. Everyone loses when it comes to income tax because the underlying principle of it is evil because it violates natural law and it produces bad results.  In addition, they would have to raise their standards of morality in order to put a correction in place.


Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land





Thursday, November 7, 2013

The Government that Never Was




 
 "He will not be mocked!  This is not one nation under God.  It never was. Had it been, it would not have been!  The Constitution would not have been written by Freemasons!  You cannot serve two masters!  You cannot serve two masters!  Praise be to God, Lord Jesus Christ."
Reported quote from Congressional stenographer, Dianne Reidy October 17th, 2013
      A lot of people like myself have been saying this, but this came from a woman who--for whatever reason--blurted this out on the congressional house floor.

A Nation under God..

If you believe that the United States is a nation under God, I'd have to ask you: What god?  God isn't that stupid or evil to come up with a government (or whatever it is)like this one.  If anyone studies just a little bit under the mainstream media cover, he can see that there is the evil hand of freemasonry always present in the proceedings.  Freemasonry, according to Albert Pike in "Morals and Dogma", worships Lucifer.  The stenographer, Dianne Reidy, called it right and, of course, she is being excoriated by the media as being some kind of nut, when in fact, the real nut cases are in the "government."  Sorry, but any kind of government founded on the principles of Lucifer is not going to have any real authority under the natural law or God's commandments.  The nation under God nonsense is, in reality, a nation under the false god; presumably Lucifer.

Damnation from the oaths...

One of the worse things a man or woman can do is to swear oaths because it is a form of lying and a practice of idolatry.  The reason why freemasonry is evil is because all of their members swears oaths.  Once the oath is in place, nothing good happens.  I've written some articles on oaths and I'll list the links at the end of this article.  Any organization that is based upon oaths are on the wrong side of God's natural order and will always bring chaos, death, and destruction along with it.  It is just better to abandon oath taking completely. Anything that happens under an oath is a cursed process, including the legal system.  It may be the reason judges and lawyers act like morons most of the time; especially when their authority is challenged. They must have a latent knowledge of their own damnation.  All we have to do is to look at the poor results of oath-taking should be enough to know that it should never be done.  And on top of all that, the pushing of the oath by the government types is a form of religious persecution.

The Scourge of Usury....

The natural law and God's commandments forbid usury or interest.  Usury, interest, and a debt money system are an extreme form of slavery.  Whether it be mental or economic chains or physical chains, the facts show that these financial systems are satanic as they are a form of slavery.  If it is offensive to God, the freemasons and the occult will use it in order to destroy mankind.  And that is the goal of government as we know it today.  It exists to destroy mankind and the joy of living.  Governments promote the conditions of war, bondage, slavery, perversion, and confiscation.

Law of conquest

Most "nations" of the world reside in a form of conquest upon which they are ruled on the foundation of the law of war; which is no law at all.  There are no rights, no civil liberties, no free markets unless the powers over the war allow it.  These systems, called "democracies", "dictatorships," republics," and so forth all reside upon the foundation of the law of war or war powers.  Ownership of these nations is under a form of feudalism (which depends heavily upon the oath) which was never defeated by any group of people.

Control

The govtards use war powers or violence to control the people and to weaken mankind.  This is done intentionally because most people in the world don't want any kind of war among themselves.  To live at peace with your neighbor is a part of the natural law and a part of the commandments in the Judeo-Christian traditions, yet the "nations" reflect very little of the lawful behavior.  However, it is the mind control that is the most devastating thing for normal people.  The freemasons and the other occultic religious groups stir the pot of confusion so that a man or woman doesn't even know the very basics about living in God's world order or the natural law.

Confiscation

Of course, a taxing system is a form of confiscation.  The level of the theft varies from one "nation" to the other, but the method is still the same.  Don't pay the tax and they will get violent.  Violence has always been the power source and the democracy or republican part is just a delusion to make people think that they have a choice.

Purpose of the rant

I am wondering why Mrs. Reidy went on this rant.  After all, this information is nothing new and I'm thinking this is yet another example of the satanic disclosure.  I find that the evil is always disclosed before it happens.  Maybe she really is a concerned lady that wanted to expose the truth.  But my question is this: If she disagreed so much with the "government", then why would she work there?  However, it is true that God would have never established a system of government like this one because it is built on an evil foundation; namely, the oath.  God would not bring forth something that stupid.  Governments that are built upon lies and distortions are in fact no governments at all, but rather a gang of liars, skanks, pimps, and thieves who wish to put their satanic world order upon everyone.  Regardless of Mrs. Reidy's motivations for this rant, she did speak the truth which was probably a first for the United States Congress.

Related articles on the oath:
Swear an Oath; Tell a Lie
All Bad Things Flow from the Oath of a Man
Stop Swearing Oaths

On Usury:
The Scourge of Usury



Walter Allen Thompson has a new book called Natural Law: The True Supreme Law of the Land